The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
“The problem is not the result of innate differences between the
races. It would be less painful if it were. If the Negro had innate
moral weakness or blindness, if he had an innately inferior
intelligence, or in some inborn way either his sex drive or his
fertility were somehow different, we could shrug off the problem by
saying, ‘God made it that way; there’s nothing to do about it.’ But
we are faced with the hard fact that reputable scientists regard as
fruitless all efforts to find valid evidence of any innate moral
weakness of the Negro or any innate difference in personality,
intelligence, or sexual behavior.”
Dr. Henderson went on in his paper to summarize many of the
mitigating factors earlier mentioned, including socio-economic
status, recreational limitations, inadequate sex education
within Negro families and schools, and the tensions generated
by discrimination. But he suspected that these various factors
together do not account for more than half the problem: “Without
a statistically valid basis for it, my opinion is strong that the
primary factor is that of motivation. _The simple fact is that many
Negro boys and girls do not want strongly enough to avoid producing
illegitimate children._ The rank and file of those who are at the
lowest social levels have not changed their attitude to illegitimacy
since the days of slavery when sexual laxness in Negroes was
tolerated and even encouraged.” [Emphasis supplied.]
A notable comment along that line appeared in the St. Louis _Evening
Whirl_, a Negro newspaper, early in 1960, in an account of a colored
woman who complained, after giving birth to her ninth illegitimate
child, that her allowance under Aid to Dependent Children had been
cut from $185 to $110 a month. She felt “discriminated against.” Said
the _Whirl_ editorially:
Mrs. Brown thinks that she is entitled to live a normal life with
a boyfriend and not have to waste money running around hotels and
rooming houses. They can’t afford it.
Mrs. Brown is young and normal. She is only 29. She cannot stop
having a boyfriend and romance now. She believes that poor people
are entitled to social pleasures and normal living.
This newspaper agrees with this version of living. The rich
have everything they want. Why can’t poor people have a little
fun? A lot of our foolish laws need changing. We do not condemn
Mrs. Brown. We rather praise her. She is living proof of a good
woman--one who is promulgating her race.
When our race increases in number to a much larger extent, we can
demand more, get more, and show our power and authority at the
polls.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account