The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 8, July, 1836Various
General
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 8, July, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
offers, for underrating their labors, and talking or acting as persons
who had conferred obligations beyond all requital, by giving much more
than they had received, or could be paid. When teachers are treated in
this way, it is, in a great measure, their own fault, and it arises
chiefly from the causes just stated. To render their intercourse with
their employers what it ought to be, and what it certainly might
become, there should be not only a feeling of entire reciprocity of
benefit as to the money part of their dealings, but a mutuality of
respect and esteem well merited on both sides. This kind of regard can
never be felt towards teachers who receive such civilities as may be
paid to them, like unexpected and unmerited favors; for if they
themselves do not appear to hold their own profession in the honor to
which it is justly entitled, who else can they expect to rate it any
higher?
In the second place, teachers are often enemies to their professional
brethren in the jealousy manifested towards each other—in a restless
and ill-restrained propensity to depreciate each other's
qualifications, and a too frequent co-operation with the slandering
part of the community, when they find the children sent to them from
other schools ignorant and ill-disposed, to ascribe it all to the
defective manner in which they have been taught, rather than to the
real and very frequent causes of incapacity, bad temper, or bad early
habits. By such practices, many foolishly imagine that they are
promoting their own particular interests, when, in fact, they are
deeply injuring the general interests of the whole class of teachers,
by contributing to impair the public confidence in all schools
whatever. For what can more effectually do this with the majority of
mankind, than to hear those who set up for their instructers in
morals, as well as in general science, continually finding fault with
each other, or silently acquiescing in its being done by persons not
of their own profession? Such conduct places them in this desperate
dilemma; if what each says of every other be false, the public must
think them all base calumniators: if it be true, the conclusion is
inevitable that they are all incapable; and either alternative would
speedily and most deservedly strip the whole of employment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account