The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 9, August, 1836Various
History
The Southern Literary Messenger, Vol. II., No. 9, August, 1836
Various
American literature -- 19th century -- Periodicals
The ancient tragedy, from its very nature, contains the concentration
of high passion. This was the very notion of it, as tragedy. And this
quality renders it an indispensable study to all those whose province
it is to scrutinize or to awaken the active powers; in other words, to
the metaphysician, the poet, and especially the orator. No doubt it
was this view of the subject which led a man no less visionary than
Mr. Fox to declare, as he does in his correspondence with Dr. Parr,
that if he had a son to educate for the senate, he would cause him to
be profoundly versed in the writings of Euripides.[1] And yet so far
as mere passion is concerned, we find it more strongly developed in
the “desolate simplicity” of Aeschylus, than in either of his
followers. This use of dramatic composition is doubtless involved in
that celebrated and vexed passage of Aristotle's Poetics, in which
tragedy is said to be efficacious to _purge the passions_. Barker
quotes Jamblichus, in illustration of this _παθηματων καθαρσις_, where
he says: “By contemplating the passions of others in tragedy and
comedy, we settle our own passions, render them more temperate, and
purify them.” Milton also, whose whole soul was steeped in Grecian
poesy, alludes in the introduction to his Samson Agonistes, to this
same remark of Aristotle, where tragedy is said “to be of power by
raising pity and fear or terror, to purge the mind of those and such
like passions, that is, to temper and reduce them to just measure.”
[Footnote 1: See Appendix to Parr's Works, Johnstone's edition. Vol.
vii. and viii.]
Alike in name, ancient and modern tragedy scarcely belong to the same
species. The grand distinction of the former is the chorus, which is
altogether inadmissible in the latter. According to the most specious
hypothesis this was the nucleus of the Greek drama, around which, by
slow degrees, the dialogue was gathered. It was the chorus, as a train
of personages unconnected with the plot, that relieved the tedium or
directed the excitement of the dialogue. Sometimes, as they appear in
significant dance, they advise, exhort, or suggest a moral; sometimes
they echo back the feeling of the actors, and always augment the
grandeur of the pageant. Thus we find the chorus ever and anon
breaking in to temper the unnatural rage of Medea, and in this respect
discharging the duty indicated by Horace,
Ille bonis faveat, et concilietur amice:
Et regat iratos, et amet pacare tumentes:
Ille dapes laudet mensac brevis: ille salubrem
Justitiam, legesque, et apertis otia portis:
Ille tegat commissa, &c.
_Ad Pisones_ 195.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account