The Sports and Pastimes of the People of England: Including the Rural and Domestic Recreations, May Games, Mummeries, Shows, Processions, Pageants, and Pompous Spectacles from the Earliest Period to the Present Time — John Shaqi
The Sports and Pastimes of the People of England: Including the Rural and Domestic Recreations, May Games, Mummeries, Shows, Processions, Pageants, and Pompous Spectacles from the Earliest Period to the Present TimeStrutt, Joseph
History
The Sports and Pastimes of the People of England: Including the Rural and Domestic Recreations, May Games, Mummeries, Shows, Processions, Pageants, and Pompous Spectacles from the Earliest Period to the Present Time
Strutt, Joseph
England -- Social life and customs; Games -- England -- History; Pageants -- England -- History; Popular culture -- England; Processions -- England -- History; Sports -- England -- History
Laws for punishing such as hunted, or destroyed the game, in the royal
forests, and other precincts belonging to the crown, were, as we have
just hinted above, established with unprecedented severity by Canute
the Dane, when he ascended the throne of England. By these edicts the
great thanes, bishops, and abbots, were permitted to hunt in the king's
chases: but all unqualified persons were subjected to very heavy fines,
not only for hunting, but even for disturbing of the game. If a
gentleman, or an inferior thane, killed a stag in the king's forests,
he was degraded from his rank; if a ceorl, or husbandman, committed the
same offence, he was reduced to slavery; and if a slave killed one,
he suffered death. Magistrates were appointed, in every county, or
shire, to put these laws in execution, and under them were appointed
inferior officers or gamekeepers, whose province it was to apprehend
the offenders.[140] By another law enacted by the same monarch, every
proprietor of land had the privilege to hunt game within his own fields
and woods; but might not pursue them into the royal forests.[141] This
prince also prohibited the exercise of hunting, or hawking, upon the
sabbath day.[142]
The severity of the game laws was rather increased, than abated, under
the governance of the four first Norman monarchs. Henry II. is said
to have relaxed their efficacy; rather, I presume, by not commanding
them to be enforced with rigour, than by causing them to be abrogated;
for they seem to have virtually existed in the reign of king John;
and occasioned the clause in the Forest Charter, insisting that no
man should forfeit his life, or his limbs, for killing the king's
deer;--but, if he was taken in the fact of stealing venison belonging
to the king, he should be subjected to a heavy fine; and, in default
of payment, be imprisoned for one year and one day; and after the
expiration of that time, find surety for his good behaviour, or be
banished the land.[143] This charter was afterwards confirmed by his
son Henry III. and the succeeding monarchs.
IX.--HUNTING BY THE CLERGY.
Another clause in the same charter grants to an archbishop, bishop,
earl, or baron, when travelling through the royal forests, at the
king's command, the privilege to kill one deer or two in the sight of
the forester, if he was at hand; if not, they were commanded to cause
a horn to be sounded,[144] that it might not appear as if they had
intended to steal the game.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account