By allowing steam to circulate through a vessel, the air may be expelled from it, and its place filled by steam. If the vessel be then closed and cooled the steam will be reduced to water, and, falling in drops on the bottom and sides of the vessel, the space which it filled will become a _vacuum_. This may be easily established by experiment. Let a long glass tube be provided with a hollow ball at one end, and having the other end open.[5] Let a small quantity of spirits be poured in at the open end, and placing the glass ball over the flame of a lamp, let the spirits be boiled. After some time the steam will be observed to issue copiously from the open end of the tube which is presented upwards. When this takes place, let the tube be inverted, and its open end plunged in a basin of cold water. The heat being thus removed, the cool air will reconvert the steam in the tube into liquid, and a vacuum will be produced, into which the pressure of the atmosphere on the surface of the water in the basin will force the water through the tube, and it will rush up with considerable force, and fill the glass ball. [Footnote 5: A common glass flask with a long neck will answer the purpose.] In this experiment it is better to use spirits than water, because they boil at a lower heat, and expose the glass to less liability to break, and also the tube may more easily be handled. CHAPTER II. FIRST STEPS IN THE INVENTION. Futility of early claims. -- Watt, the real Inventor. -- Hero of Alexandria. -- Blasco Garay. -- Solomon de Caus. -- Giovanni Branca. -- Marquis of Worcester. -- Sir Samuel Morland. -- Denis Papin. -- Thomas Savery. (22.) In the history of the progress of the useful arts and manufactures, there is perhaps no example of any invention the credit of which has been so keenly contested as that of the steam engine. Claims to it have been advanced by different nations, and by different individuals of the same nation. The partisans of the competitors for this honour have argued their pretensions, and pressed their claims, with a zeal which has occasionally outstripped the bounds of discretion; and the contest has not unfrequently been tinged with prejudices, both national and personal, and marked with a degree of asperity quite unworthy of so noble a cause, and altogether beneath the dignity of science.