The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
In the paper above referred to, Mr. Wheatstone says,—“I recommend, as
a convenient arrangement of the _refracting_ stereoscope for viewing
Daguerreotypes of small dimensions, the instrument represented, (Fig.
4,) shortened in its length from 8 inches to 5, and lenses 5 inches
focal distance, placed before and close to the prisms.”[26] Although
this refracting apparatus, which is simply a _deterioration_ of the
lenticular stereoscope, is recommended by Mr. Wheatstone, nobody
either makes it or uses it. The semi-lenses or quarter-lenses of the
lenticular stereoscope _include a virtual and absolutely perfect
prism_, and, what is of far more consequence, each lens is a variable
lenticular prism, so that, when the eye-tubes are placed at different
distances, the lenses have different powers of displacing the pictures.
They can thus unite pictures placed at different distances, which
cannot be done by any combination of whole lenses and prisms.
[26] _Ibid._, pp. 9, 10.
In the autumn of 1854, after all the facts about the stereoscope
were before the public, and Mr. Wheatstone in full possession of all
the merit of having anticipated Mr. Elliot in the publication of
his stereoscopic apparatus, and of his explanation of the theory of
stereoscopic relief, such as it was, he thought it proper to revive
the controversy by transmitting to the Abbé Moigno, for publication in
Cosmos, an extract of a letter of mine dated 27th September 1838. This
extract was published in the _Cosmos_ of the 15th August 1854,[27] with
the following illogical commentary by the editor.
“Nous avons eu tort mille fois d’accorder à notre
illustre ami, Sir David Brewster, l’invention du
stéréoscope par réfraction. M. Wheatstone, en effet,
a mis entre nos mains une lettre datée, le croirait
on, du 27 Septembre 1838, dans lequel nous avons
lû ces mots écrits par l’illustre savant Ecossais:
‘I have also stated that you promised to order
for me your stereoscope, both with reflectors and
PRISMS. J’ai aussi dit (à Lord Rosse[28])
que vous aviez promis de commander pour moi votre
stéréoscope, celui avec réflecteurs et celui avec
prismes.’ Le stéréoscope par réfraction est donc,
aussi bien que le stéréoscope par réflexion, le
stéréoscope de M. Wheatstone, qui l’avait inventé
en 1838, et le faisait construire à cette époque
pour Sir David Brewster lui-même. Ce que Sir
David Brewster a imaginée, et c’est une idée très
ingénieuse, dont M. Wheatstone ne lui disputât
jamais la gloire, c’est de former les deux prismes
du stéréoscope par réfraction avec les deux moitiés
d’une même lentille.”
[27] Vol. v. livre viii. p. 241.
[28] Mr. Andrew Ross, the celebrated optician!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account