The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
[2] _De Usu Partium Corporis Humani_, edit. Lugduni, 1550, p. 593.
In such distinct and unambiguous terms, intelligible to the meanest
capacity, does this illustrious writer announce the fundamental law
of binocular vision—the grand principle of the Stereoscope, namely,
that _the picture of the solid column which we see with both eyes is
composed of two dissimilar pictures, as seen by each eye separately_.
As the vision of the solid column, therefore, was obtained by the union
of these dissimilar pictures, an instrument only was wanted to take
such pictures, and another to combine them. The Binocular Photographic
Camera was the one instrument, and the Stereoscope the other.
The subject of binocular vision was studied by various optical writers
who have flourished since the time of Galen. Baptista Porta, one of
the most eminent of them, repeats, in his work _On Refraction_, the
propositions of Euclid on the vision of a sphere with one and both
eyes, and he cites from Galen the very passage which we have given
above on the dissimilarity of the three pictures seen by each eye and
by both. Believing that we see only with one eye at a time, he denies
the accuracy of Euclid’s theorems, and while he admits the correctness
of the observations of Galen, he endeavours to explain them upon other
principles.
[Illustration: FIG. 1.]
In illustrating the views of Galen on the dissimilarity of the three
pictures which are requisite in binocular vision, he employs a much
more distinct diagram than that which is given by the Greek physician.
“Let A,” he says, “be the pupil of the right eye, B that of the left,
and DC the body to be seen. When we look at the object with both eyes
we see DC, while with the left eye we see EF, and with the right eye
GH. But if it is seen with one eye, it will be seen otherwise, for when
the left eye B is shut, the body CD, on the left side, will be seen in
HG; but when the right eye is shut, the body CD will be seen in FE,
whereas, when both eyes are opened at the same time, it will be seen
in CD.” These results are then explained by copying the passage from
Galen, in which he supposes the observer to repeat these experiments
when he is looking at a solid column.
In looking at this diagram, we recognise at once not only the
principle, but the construction of the stereoscope. The double
stereoscopic picture or slide is represented by HE; the right-hand
picture, or the one seen by the right eye, by HF; the left-hand
picture, or the one seen by the left eye, by GE; and the picture of the
solid column in full relief by DC, as produced midway between the other
two dissimilar pictures, HF and GE, by their union, precisely as in the
stereoscope.[3]
[3] Joan. Baptistæ Portæ Neap., _De Refractione Optices parte_, lib. v.
p. 132, and lib. vi. pp. 143-5. Neap. 1593.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account