The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to educationBrewster, David
History
The stereoscope : $b its history, theory, and construction, with its application to the fine and useful arts and to education
Brewster, David
Stereoscope
Galen, therefore, and the Neapolitan philosopher, who has employed
a more distinct diagram, certainly knew and adopted the fundamental
principle of the stereoscope; and nothing more was required, for
producing pictures in full relief, than a simple instrument for uniting
HF and GE, the right and left hand dissimilar pictures of the column.
[Illustration: FIG. 2.]
In the treatise on painting which he left behind him in MS.,[4]
Leonardo da Vinci has made a distinct reference to the dissimilarity
of the pictures seen by each eye as the reason why “a painting, though
conducted with the greatest art, and finished to the last perfection,
both with regard to its contours, its lights, its shadows, and its
colours, can never shew a _relievo_ equal to that of the natural
objects, unless these be viewed at a distance and with a single
eye,”[5] which he thus demonstrates. “If an object C be viewed by a
single eye at A, all objects in the space behind it—included, as it
were, in a shadow ECF, cast by a candle at A—are invisible to an eye at
A; but when the other eye at B is opened, part of these objects become
visible to it; those only being hid from both eyes that are included,
as it were, in the double shadow CD, cast by two lights at A and B and
terminated in D; the angular space EDG, beyond D, being always visible
to both eyes. And the hidden space CD is so much the shorter as the
object C is smaller and nearer to the eyes. Thus he observes that
the object C, seen with both eyes, becomes, as it were, transparent,
according to the usual definition of a transparent thing, namely, that
which hides nothing beyond it. But this cannot happen when an object,
whose breadth is bigger than that of the pupil, is viewed by a single
eye. The truth of this observation is, therefore, evident, because a
painted figure intercepts all the space behind its apparent place, so
as to preclude the eyes from the sight of every part of the imaginary
ground behind it. Hence,” continues Dr. Smith, “we have one help to
distinguish the place of a near object more accurately _with both eyes
than with one_, inasmuch as we see it more detached from other objects
beyond it, _and more of its own surface, especially if it be roundish_.”
[4] _Trattata della Pictura, Scultura, ed Architettura._ Milan, 1584.
[5] Dr. Smith’s _Compleat System of Opticks_, vol. ii., Remarks, pp. 41
and 244.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account