The technique of the American short story is more or less fixed and
numerous textbooks have been compiled thereon. But technique is not a
rigid matter. The importance of the subject matter or sheer artistry
can often “put over” a story that defies every one of the traditional
or accepted rules. Too, different editors and different magazines have
their own ideas on technique. Therefore, for any one who would write
it is best to study and analyze carefully the pages of the various
magazines.
To succeed in the short story field the writer needs not only to know
how to write but where to sell. To get before the short story reading
public it is vital not only to have a story to tell and to know how to
tell it but to know also where to offer that story when it is told.
In selling a short story it is not primarily the attitude of any one
individual critic or group of self-appointed critics that matters;
it is the attitude of the editor toward the particular story under
consideration. As there are many stories there are many editors. They
are all on the lookout for new and good material. If you have created
a good story it is bound some day to find its publisher and thereby to
reach its public.
In order that this book may be of practical service to the new writer
and to those already well established the editors were asked why
they bought the particular stories they did, in other words their
attitude in fiction buying. Their replies are printed verbatim. Many
came in the form of personal letters and this will explain why there
may be a certain lack of formality in some of the editorial replies.
But on consideration this was decided the most practical way in which
the editor might reach his audience. Analysis of the answers will
show the veriest tyro that a story that might do excellently for the
Metropolitan need not be desired by the Dial and vice versa.
In the compiler’s mind the magazines automatically group themselves
into classes, a grouping which attempts to reach no conclusion as to
relative literary or commercial values. Certain of these magazines were
asked to include a story that had appeared in its pages and which from
the point of view of that magazine’s editorial policy was a highly
desirable and good story. Here the editors hesitated: they had many
good stories that might be included. Eventually, though, choices were
made and the authors kindly consenting to their reprinting, the stories
are given herewith.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account