The Story of Dutch PaintingCaffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
History
The Story of Dutch Painting
Caffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
Painting, Dutch
Hitherto all the hope of the patriots had centered in William of Orange.
In declaring their independence, they offered him the crown. Partly to
prove the disinterestedness of his motives, still more perhaps because
he believed that the final release from Spain could be effected only by
putting the new state under the protection of France or England, he
refused the dignity. Fortunately, however, France continued to be a reed
on which no dependence could be placed, and the English help, when it
did come, was indirect. Meanwhile, Philip’s ban was still out against
the Stadtholder, and an attempt was made upon his life. He was shot in
the face, but recovered from the wound, to fall a victim, however, two
years later, to the pistol of one Balthasar Gerard. The tragedy occurred
on July 10, 1584.
It had removed the chief obstacle to Philip’s success. Maurice would
worthily succeed his father in the generalship of the war; but the brain
and conscience, the unswerving patience and unselfishness, that had
given some reality of union to the rival elements of the United
Provinces, were buried with William the Silent. The exaggerated
individualism of the several provinces and cities would have put them at
the mercy of Philip, had he not himself been distracted from any
singleness of purpose by the same cause. His own exaggerated egoism,
inflated with the ambition to be a world-power, prevented him from
concentrating his efforts upon the subjugation of the republic. He still
strove to force his influence upon the affairs of France, and meanwhile
made preparations to subdue England.
Thus Elizabeth, much as her Tudor instinct may have shrunk from the idea
of encouraging rebellion against kingship, was induced by her advisers
to make common cause with the Dutch against Spain. She refused their
offer of the crown, but lent them money and some troops under the
command of Leicester. He proved inefficient as a general, and, while a
few names, such as that of Sir Philip Sidney, stand out heroically,
England’s real contribution to Dutch independence was indirect. It was
Drake’s incessant harrying of Spanish ships and ports and the
destruction of the two Armadas that distracted Spain, broke her power
of offense, and hastened the exhaustion of her waning resources. Thus
the struggle with the provinces continued on land, but became more
desultory, while of the sea the Dutch had practically undisputed
mastery. The result was an accession of adventurous spirit that, while
it failed in the attempt to discover a Northwest Passage, established
settlements in the East Indies, wore down the competition of the
Spaniards in the trade of those regions, and inaugurated a condition of
extraordinary commercial prosperity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account