At first, therefore, the former afforded far the best fighting
material. They were largely--and entirely, as far as their leaders
were concerned--gentlemen and men accustomed to the use of arms, but
there they remained, and showed little aptitude of infusing into their
natural martial ardour the stern and necessary tonic of discipline.
On the other hand, the early armies of the Parliament were “hirelings
whom want and idleness had reduced to enlist.” Even Hampden’s regiment,
one of the best of any, was described by Cromwell as a “mere rabble
of tapsters and serving-men out of place.” No one saw this more than
Cromwell, and it is that instinct which makes him stand out among the
leaders of the Civil War. No one more fully recognised than he that
“you must get men of spirit: of a spirit that is likely to go on as
far as gentlemen will go, or else I am sure you will be beaten still.”
The metal might be there, but it wanted tempering, and the opportunity
for this the “self-denying ordinance” gave. By means of this the army
was purged of all its weaker parts. As Cromwell had organised his own
special regiment, so did he infuse into the rest of the force some
of the stern enthusiasm that made his Ironsides “very devils”[13] in
battle, fearless and fearful factors in the fight. They “prospered
because they were much in prayer and reading Scripture, an exercise
that till of late soldiers have used but little.” They “were constant,
conscientious, sober, strict, and thus conquered much upon the vanity
and looseness of the enemy. Men fought on principle as well as for pay;
they were little mutinous in disputing commands, fair in their marches,
to friends merciful in battle, and in success to their enemies.”
Finally their commissioners were “wise, provident, active, faithful in
providing ammunition, arms, recruits, of men’s clothes, and that family
must needs strive that hath good stewards.” It was inured to war,
therefore, by a series of campaigns in which strategical as well as
tactical conditions were beginning to be foreshadowed. Its organisation
was more complete and thorough than heretofore, its men were imbued
with the stern religious enthusiasm which has ever rendered such armies
dangerous. It knew its strength and had gauged it by its continued
success; what it had had to do had been God-directed (so its leaders
and rank and file thought, or professed to think), and bore the imprint
of immediate divine direction.
Thus it was, when the great Protector died, that the army he left was
probably the most formidable body of armed men the world had ever seen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account