The story of the UkraineManning, Clarence Augustus
History
The story of the Ukraine
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Kievan Rus -- History; Ukraine -- History
It was abundantly evident that in this controversy the actual power
lay in the hands of the King and the Uniats. King Sigismund, of the
Catholic branch of the Vasa line of Sweden, had no intention of giving
any rights to the Orthodox and his followers controlled the organs of
the state. The Orthodox could do little but argue, write and talk and
that seemed little enough. With the control of the state on their side,
the Uniats felt that they could overlook the many polemical pamphlets
that were hurled against them, especially by Ivan Vyshensky, the most
celebrated of the defenders of Orthodoxy. Vyshensky was a monk who
had studied at Mount Athos. He was a conservative in the educational
disputes and felt that the modern schools were not severely Orthodox
enough, not enough critical of the modern Western learning; but when
it came to the dispute over the Union, he stood firmly with the
brotherhoods. His pamphlets, written with bitter invective against the
Uniats, had a telling effect.
The King and his lords paid no attention. They were sure of an ultimate
victory and set about acting accordingly. They commenced to dispossess
by force those of the bishops and priests who refused to accept the
Union and on the death of the Metropolitan of Kiev, Rohoza, in 1590,
they appointed as the new Metropolitan Poty, who was the violent
advocate of the Union. Poty kept urging the King and the government to
further acts of aggression against the Orthodox and his arguments fell
upon willing ears.
Yet it was a long distance between talk and realization. The Orthodox
fought zealously in defence of their rights, as they considered them,
although it was evident that they were fighting a losing battle. The
number of influential lords on their side and in the Polish senate
was steadily decreasing as more and more of them became Polonized and
joined the Roman Catholic Church. Even a promise of the King in 1597,
forced by the foreign situation, that he would appoint only Orthodox
to the Orthodox sees and parishes remained a dead letter, for the
King did not feel himself bound by any promise to the heretics or the
dissidents, as they were now called in Polish official language.
The reaction varied in the different provinces. In Lviv and Peremyshl
where there were still Orthodox bishops, even though the influence
of Polish landlords was strong, there was some relief. In those
dioceses where the Catholic landlords joined with the Uniat bishops
the situation was worse. In some others, as Kiev, where there still
remained a considerable number of Orthodox landlords, there was a still
different situation and in Kiev particularly, Prince Vasil Konstantin
Ostrozky as governor of the province openly disobeyed the orders of the
king.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account