The Study of Astronomy, adapted to the capacities of youth: In twelve familiar dialogues, between a tutor and his pupil: explaining the general phænomena of the heavenly bodies, the theory of the tides, &c.Stedman, John, teacher of astronomy
Science
The Study of Astronomy, adapted to the capacities of youth: In twelve familiar dialogues, between a tutor and his pupil: explaining the general phænomena of the heavenly bodies, the theory of the tides, &c.
Stedman, John, teacher of astronomy
Astronomy -- Juvenile literature -- Early works to 1800
PUPIL. Certainly not: on the opposite side of the course his motion
would be the same as when I stood in the center of it; when he was
approaching me, I should scarcely see him move; in that part of the
course next to me he would move in a direction contrary to what he did
at first; and again when going from me, his motion would be scarcely
visible.
TUTOR. This I think will give you a tolerable idea of the irregular
motion of the inferior planets, as seen from the earth. When farthest
from us their motion is said to be direct; when nearest to us
retrograde, because they appear to be moving back again; and, when
approaching, or going from us, we say they are stationary; because, if
then observed in a line with any particular star, they will continue so
for a considerable time: now these appearances could not happen if they
moved round the earth.
PUPIL. Nothing can be plainer: for if the earth were in the center we
should always see them move the same way.
TUTOR. When the planet is nearest to us, that is in a line between us
and the sun, we say it is in its inferior conjunction; when farthest
from us, and the sun is between us and the planet, in its superior
conjunction. But the superior planets have alternately a conjunction and
an opposition.
PUPIL. A conjunction, I suppose, when the sun is between the earth and
the planet, and an opposition when the earth is between the sun and the
planet; that is, when the planet is nearest to us, and appears to be
opposite to the sun?
TUTOR. You are right.—Therefore, when in conjunction it rises and sets,
nearly with the sun; but in opposition, it rises nearly when the sun
sets, and sets when he rises.
PUPIL. Why do you say nearly, Sir?
TUTOR. Because it cannot be exactly, but when the sun, earth, and planet
are in a _right_ line, which seldom happens.
PUPIL. How do you account for this, Sir?
TUTOR. At present I fear you will not be able to comprehend what I wish
to explain, as I must use a term you are unacquainted with. The reason
is, that the planets are very seldom in or near their nodes at their
conjunctions or oppositions.
PUPIL. I do not indeed understand what you mean by the word _nodes_.
TUTOR. It will be explained to you in due time, and I shall conclude
this evening with a few more remarks relative to the appearance of the
planets.
PUPIL. Any thing you please, Sir.
TUTOR. You know that the planets, being opaque bodies, receive their
light from the sun; and that only that part which is turned to the sun
can be enlightened by him, whilst the opposite side must remain in
darkness.
PUPIL. This is self-evident: if I hold my ball to the candle it will
have the same effect.
TUTOR. Tell me then how you think they will appear as seen from the
earth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account