The suppression of tuberculosis: $b Together with observations concerning phthisiogenesis in man and animals and suggestions concerning the hygiene of cow stables and the production of milk for infant-feeding, with special reference to tuberculosis — John Shaqi
The suppression of tuberculosis: $b Together with observations concerning phthisiogenesis in man and animals and suggestions concerning the hygiene of cow stables and the production of milk for infant-feeding, with special reference to tuberculosisBehring, Emil von
Science
The suppression of tuberculosis: $b Together with observations concerning phthisiogenesis in man and animals and suggestions concerning the hygiene of cow stables and the production of milk for infant-feeding, with special reference to tuberculosis
Behring, Emil von
Tuberculosis -- Prevention
The expression _hereditary transmission of tuberculosis_, or rather,
_of tubercle bacilli_, may be construed in several different ways.
It may mean the hereditary transmission from father or mother, or
from grandfather or grandmother, or from ancestors still further
back. If we designate the parental transmission as _congenital
heredity_, transmission from further back as _pregenital heredity_,
then in my view of the origin of pulmonary consumption, generally
neither congenital nor pregenital heredity comes into play. And,
looking at the matter as I do, if one is still desirous of speaking
of the hereditary influences of relatives, one ought to use the
term _postgenital_. It is now almost everywhere conceded that human
tuberculosis as a rule is actually of postgenital origin.
Experience has taught me that if, in scientific investigation, one
wishes to discover something new, one should study the exceptions to
the rule. In actual practice, on the other hand, it is well to keep
to the rule. We may therefore safely ignore the cases of congenital
tuberculosis, but must all the more thoroughly study the circumstances
which in extra-uterine life govern the tubercular infections which lead
to consumption. And here I believe I have discovered a new principle
which may be expressed thus:
“_The milk fed to infants is the chief cause of consumption._”
This assertion will at first sight be surprising, for it has long been
maintained that the suckling infant receives milk free or almost free
from germs. Mother’s or nurse’s milk is taken by the child in this
condition, and the cow’s milk for artificially nourished children is
usually first boiled or scalded. In later life, to be sure, much less
attention is paid to securing a milk as sterile as possible. How,
then, is this to be reconciled with the above statement, that it is
especially the _milk fed to infants_ which constitutes the chief danger
in causing tuberculosis?
And yet this statement is true, not because the milk fed to infants is
at all worse than other milk, but because the human infant, like the
young of all other mammals, is destitute of the protective agencies
in his alimentary system which at a later period of life prevent the
entrance of disease germs into his tissues. It has taken many years of
experimental work to demonstrate this fact conclusively. At present,
however, the chain of evidence is so strong that I have not the least
hesitancy in building on it my entire plan for the suppression of
tuberculosis.
In this lecture I can do no more than summarize the main proofs for my
assertion regarding the ready penetrability of the infantile alimentary
tract for all disease germs, but especially for tubercle bacilli.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account