London (England) -- Description and travel; London (England) -- History -- 16th century -- Sources; London (England) -- Surveys
Stow’s life was a stormy one, and he had much to endure, both publicly
and in his own family, but his friends helped him through many of his
difficulties. His younger brother Thomas was ungrateful, and a thorn in
his side for many years.
In the early part of 1569 he was brought before the Lord Mayor for
having in his possession a copy of the manifesto of the Spanish
Ambassador on behalf of the Duke of Alva, but he seems to have been able
to clear himself. The same matter was brought before the master and
wardens of the Merchant Taylors’ Company. Mr. Clode remarks respecting
this occurrence: “It is curious to note from the depositions of the
several examinants how very shy of knowing much about the matter they
appear to have been. The knowledge or memory of the nine taylors
examined was too frequently failing them to bring guilt home to any
brother of the craft.”
The trouble about the Alva manifesto drew the attention of the Queen’s
Council to Stow’s library, and the Bishop of London (Grindal) was
directed to have his house searched, and in reply the Bishop enclosed
to Cecil a catalogue of “Stowe the taylour his unlawfull bookes,”
amongst these are “a great store of folishe fabulous bokes of old prynt
as of Sir Degory, Sir Tryamore,” etc., “old fantastical popish books
printed in the old type.” Thomas Stapleton’s translation of Bede’s
_Ecclesiastical History_ is among the objectionable books. Nothing,
however, came of all this pother.
Stow appears to have been fairly well off for some years of his life,
when he spent a considerable amount of money on the extensive collection
of manuscripts which he gathered together. This library was well known
to and much appreciated by his fellow antiquaries. Many of the important
documents are now in the British Museum and other public libraries.
He gave up his business in order to devote himself uninterruptedly to
his antiquarian labours. Although these labours were much appreciated
they were not profitable, and in consequence his means were very limited
in his later years. His poverty was brought under the notice of James
I., who acknowledged his claims, but instead of giving substantial aid
the king granted letters patent, dated 8th March 1604, authorising John
Stow and his deputies to collect money--the “voluntary contribution and
kind gratuities” of the king’s subjects. This authority brought little
money to the chronicler’s wasted coffers, and it was indeed a pitiful
reward for the well-directed labours of a life-time.
Stow did not long survive this remarkable instance of royal favour. He
died on the 6th April 1605, and was buried in the Church of St. Andrew
Undershaft, Leadenhall Street, where his widow erected a terra cotta
monument to his memory, this, which shows the man as he lived, is one of
the most interesting monuments in the city of a past London worthy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account