The Survey, Volume 30, Number 4, Apr 26, 1913 — John Shaqi
The Survey, Volume 30, Number 4, Apr 26, 1913Various
History
The Survey, Volume 30, Number 4, Apr 26, 1913
Various
Charities -- Periodicals; Social problems -- Periodicals; United States -- Social conditions -- Periodicals
The report gives the usual account of inspection of institutions both
state and county and shows that the commissioner with her very limited
office and inspection force was able to do much more work than would be
expected. On the whole it seems as though the plan of a single headed
commission is a success in the state of Oklahoma.
FEDERAL QUARANTINE AT NEW YORK
THOMAS W. SALMON, M. D.
Attention has again been directed to the unsatisfactory conditions which
prevail in the administration of quarantine inspection at the port of
New York by the report of a special committee of the New York Academy of
Medicine.
This report, which was recently made public, strongly advocated the
national control of quarantine from “the point of view of convenience,
efficiency and uniformity of administration, economy and law.” The
subject aroused discussion in the newspapers a few weeks ago because the
chairman of Governor Sulzer’s commission for the investigation of state
departments urged the transfer of this function to the federal
government.
In the discussion of this recommendation, several important points have
been overlooked. For example, there is some significance in the
discrepancy between the large sums spent by New York on the quarantine
station, which protects the country at large, and the small amount
expended for the State Health Department, upon which rests the
protection of the citizens of the state. Doubtless, as has been pointed
out, the fees charged steamship companies can be increased so that the
state will not be required to make any annual appropriations for the
maintenance of the quarantine station but the health officer of the port
has asked for an appropriation of about $1,800,000 for needed repairs
and improvements. About $180,000 is appropriated for the State
Department of Health each year. This constitutes practically all the
money spent by the state for the protection of the health of its
9,000,000 citizens. Out of it must be paid all salaries and expenses of
administration, the cost of collecting vital statistics, maintaining
laboratories for research and for the production of diphtheria
antitoxin, the control of epidemics, the inspection of water supplies
and, in short, all the work in the prevention of disease in which the
state is engaged. If the Legislature grants the $1,800,000 which the
health officer of the port requests, it will give him an amount equal to
that expended during ten years for safeguarding the health of those
residing in the state.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account