The Swedes on the Delaware, 1638-1664Johnson, Amandus
History
The Swedes on the Delaware, 1638-1664
Johnson, Amandus
Delaware River Valley (N.Y.-Del. and N.J.) -- History; New Sweden -- History; Swedes -- United States
Every hour the Dutch lines were drawn closer around the doomed fort. On
September 7 a Dutch flag was raised on the new ship in Fish River, and
“Dutch banners were waving everywhere.” In the morning a commission
from Rising waited on Stuyvesant at Fort Casimir. The deputation
consisted of Hendrick von Elswick, Gregorious van Dyck, and Peter
Rambo. A memorial in seven paragraphs had been given to them, defining
their powers and method of their procedure. Elswick, who was to give
an oral answer to Stuyvesant’s demand of surrender, should see to it
that the honor of the crown of Sweden and of the Commercial College
was respected, and that Rising and the other officers were given their
proper titles for the dignity of their superiors. The commissioners
were to refute Stuyvesant’s demands by presenting the Swedish claims to
the country, saying that they would defend it to the last; they were
to endeavor to persuade him to desist from further hostilities, on
the ground that a continuation of the siege would cause a rupture in
the relations of the two nations in Europe, and as they were closely
akin in religion they ought to be friends, the country being large
enough for both. Elswick was further to insist that the dispute about
the boundaries could best be settled in Europe, and lastly he should
protest against the imprisonment of Höök. The deputation presented
these remonstrances as well as several other protests and demanded
that Stuyvesant should withdraw his troops from the fort at once. But
Stuyvesant simply replied that he was following the orders of his
superiors, who must shoulder the consequences. On September 9 Elswick
was ordered in the name of his superiors to protest in writing against
the robberies and atrocities of the Dutch soldiers. Stuyvesant answered
the letter the same day. He allowed the Swedes _no rights_
in the river, refuted Rising’s arguments, and again demanded the
surrender of the fort. Another council of war was thereupon called.
It was decided that Rising should request an interview with the
Dutch governor, “especially since he had on two successive days ...
demanded a conference,” and a messenger was sent informing Stuyvesant
of this decision. As the proposal was agreeable to Stuyvesant, the
two governors met for a conference between the fort and the Dutch
camp.][34] “A complete reply was made to ... [Stuyvesant’s] lengthy
letter of the previous day,” and more vigorous protests were uttered
against his procedure. But they could come to no terms, and Rising
returned to Christina to await further developments. On the following
day the Dutch batteries were brought to completion. Stuyvesant “daily
demanded Rising’s surrender with great threats”; sent a drummer on
the twelfth (twenty-second) and thirteenth (twenty-third), requiring
another colloquy with Rising, and demanded that the fort should be
surrendered before sunset on the last mentioned day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account