We must now say a few words as on our own share in the work. With respect to the Introduction, fully convinced as we are of the truth and importance of the general principle maintained in it, we do not wish to press, as matter of certainty, all or any of the minor details into which that theory is carried. We believe, indeed, that the more the subject has been studied, the more truthful our views will appear to be: but we wish the reader to bear in mind, that the weakness of any portion of them is no argument against their reception, as a whole. At the same time, none can be more aware than ourselves how much more ably such views might have been advocated: we have not, however, spared {xii} time or pains in the study of the subject; 'and if we have done meanly, it is that we could attain unto.' In the Translation, we have endeavoured, too often unsuccessfully, to retain the beautiful simplicity of the original. In the obscure passages, of which there are not a few, we have mentioned the difficulty in the notes, lest the reader, by our mistake, should be led into error himself. The quotations from Holy Scripture are given in the authorised version, except where, to bring out the author's full meaning, it was necessary to have recourse to the Vulgate; and we have then translated literally from that. We have felt no small pleasure in thus enabling this excellent prelate, though at so far distant a land from his own, and after a silence of nearly six hundred years, being dead, yet to speak: and if the following pages are at all useful in pointing out the sacramental character of Catholic art, we shall be abundantly rewarded, as being fellow-workers with him in the setting forth of one, now too much forgotten, Church principle. J. M. N. B. W. _Michaelmas_, 1842. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY ---- SACRAMENTALITY: A PRINCIPLE OF ECCLESIASTICAL DESIGN ANALYSIS OF THE INTRODUCTORY ESSAY INTRODUCTION. 1. Spread of the study of Church Architecture. 2. Obvious, but indefinable, difference between old and new churches. Wherein this consists. Not in association, Nor in correctness of details, Nor in the Picturesque, Nor in the Mechanical advantages, But in Reality considered, in an enlarged view, as Sacramentality. 3. This probable, from examples, and promises in Holy Scripture. Catholic consent, examples to the contrary, philosophical reasons. 4. Enunciation of the subject. 5. Writers on the subject, Pugin, Poole, Lewis, Coddington, the writers of the Cambridge Camden Society. A. ARGUMENTS FOR SYMBOLISM. I. A PRIORI. Symbolising spirit of Catholic Antiquity, in (a) Interpretation of Holy Scriptures. (b) Analogy of the Jewish Ceremonies. (c) Private manners. (d) Emblems in Catacombs, etc. (e) Symbolical interpretation of Heathen writers.