Jesus Christ -- Biography; Palestine -- Social life and customs; Syria -- Social life and customs
In the first chapter of St. Mark's Gospel, the thirty-second and
thirty-third verses, it is said, "And at even, when the sun did set,
they brought unto him all that were diseased, and them that were
possessed of devils. And _all the city_ was gathered together at the
door." The swiftness with which the poor people in Eastern communities
bring their sick to a healer, be he a prophet or only a physician, is
proverbial. Because of the scarcity of physicians, as well as of money
with which to pay for medical attendance, when a healer is summoned to
a home many afflicted persons come or are brought to him. The peoples
of the East have always believed also in the healing of diseases by
religious means. When a prophet arises the first thing expected of him
is that he should heal the sick. Both the priest and the physician
{111} are appealed to in time of trouble. To those who followed and
believed in him Jesus was the healer of both the soul and the body.
But note the account of the incident before us. The place was the city
of Capernaum, and we are told that "_all the city_ was gathered
together at the door" of the house where Jesus was bestowing the
loving, healing touch upon the sick. Was the _whole city_ at the door?
Were _all_ the sick in that large city brought into that house for
Jesus to heal them? Here we are confronted by a physical
impossibility. An Anglo-Saxon chronicler would have said, "Quite a
number gathered at the door," which in all probability would have been
a _correct_ report.
But to the Oriental writer the object of the report was not _to
determine the number_ of those who stood outside, nor to insist that
each and every sick person in Capernaum was brought into the humble
home of Simon and Andrew. It was rather to glorify the Great Teacher
and his divine work of mercy, and not to give a photographic report of
the attendant {112} circumstances. The saying, "Quite a number
gathered at the door," may be correct, but to an Oriental it is
absolutely colorless and tasteless, an inexcusably parsimonious use of
the imagination.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account