"The System," As Uncovered by the San Francisco Graft ProsecutionHichborn, Franklin
History
"The System," As Uncovered by the San Francisco Graft Prosecution
Hichborn, Franklin
Political corruption -- California -- San Francisco; San Francisco (Calif.) -- Politics and government
[30] As early as 1901, C. E. Grunsky, at that time City Engineer,
was directed by the Board of Supervisors to gather data on the
operation of electric roads under the conduit system. Grunsky's
findings were to the effect that conduit-electric roads were
rapidly replacing other types of street railroads.
The city also employed J. C. H. Stutt as consulting engineer,
and sent him to New York and Washington to inspect and report
upon the conduit systems in operation in those cities.
He reported that the system was giving satisfaction in both
cities, and in many cases was being substituted for the
trolley. Engineer Stutt in comparing the two systems said:
"As between the overhead system and the conduit-electric
system, it is natural for private corporations to prefer the
overhead trolley system on account of the first cost of roadbed
construction, which is more than twice as great for the conduit
system. The conduit system leaves the street open with the view
unobstructed by poles, conductors, feed, guard and supporting
wires and without the menace to the public and especially to
the firemen, always inherent in the bare overhead electric
conductor."
This report was widely quoted during the
overhead-trolley-conduit agitation that was a feature of a
greater part of Mayor Schmitz's administrations.
[31] Mr. Parsons found for the overhead trolley on the following
general grounds:
(1) That a uniform system was necessary.
(2) That the lines must be extended to the suburbs.
(3) That operation by overhead trolley is more satisfactory than by
the conduit system.
(4) That the greater part of the roads could be operated under
trolley only.
[32] Several questions were presented. The following is the vote as
given in the Merchants' Association Review, the organization's
official publication, for February, 1906:
"TOTAL VOTE OF MEMBERS, 364.
"1--Do you favor Mr. Parsons's view of a uniform system of
overhead trolley lines throughout the entire city,
including a central line of ornamental trolley poles, with
lights furnished by the Railroad company between the tracks
on Market Street, and a trolley line with ornamental poles
and lights furnished by the Railroad upon Sutter Street?
"Votes received--Yes, 121; No, 204.
"2--Do you favor an overhead trolley system throughout the city
except on Market Street?
"Votes received--Yes, 67; No, 212.
"3--Do you favor an underground conduit system for Market
Street and for the streets with cable lines leading into
Market Street in the central downtown district and in the
adjacent residence district, the remainder of the system to
be overhead trolley?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account