The Tale of the Great MutinyFitchett, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The Tale of the Great Mutiny
Fitchett, W. H. (William Henry)
India -- History -- Sepoy Rebellion, 1857-1858
If John Lawrence had to disband or suppress 36,000 mutinous Sepoys in
the Punjaub, he was able to enlist from Ghoorkas and Sikhs and the wild
tribes on the Afghan borders more than another 36,000 to take their
places. He fed the scanty and gallant force which kept the British flag
flying before Delhi with an ever-flowing stream of native soldiers of
sufficient fidelity. At the time of the Mutiny there were 38,000 British
soldiers in a population of 180,000,000. If the Mutiny had been indeed
a “national” uprising, what chances of survival would the handful of
British have had?
It is quite true that the Mutiny, in its later stages, drew to itself
political forces, and took a political aspect. The Hindu Sepoy, says
Herbert Edwardes, “having mutinied about a cartridge, had nothing to
propose for an Empire, and fell in, of necessity, with the only policy
which was feasible at the moment, a Mohammedan king of Delhi. And so,
with a revived Mogul dynasty at its head, the Mutiny took the form of
a struggle between the Moslem and the Christian for empire, and this
agitated every village in which there was a mosque or a mollah.” But
the emergence of the Mogul dynasty in the struggle was an afterthought,
not to say, an accident. The old king at Delhi, discrowned and almost
forgotten, was caught up by the mutineers as a weapon or a flag.
The outbreak was thus, at the beginning, a purely military mutiny;
but its complexion and character later on were affected by local
circumstances. In Oude, for example, the Mutiny was welcomed, as it
seemed to offer those dispossessed by the recent annexation, a chance
of revenge. At Delhi it found a centre in the old king’s palace, an
inspiration in Mohammedan fanaticism, and a nominal leader in the
representative of the old Mogul dynasty. So the Mutiny grew into a new
struggle for empire on the part of some of the Mohammedan princes.
Many of the contributing causes of the Mutiny are clear enough.
Discipline had grown perilously lax throughout Bengal; and the Bengal
troops were, of all who marched under the Company’s flag, the most
dangerous when once they got out of hand. They consisted mainly of
high-caste Brahmins and Rajpoots. They burned with caste pride. They were
of incredible arrogance. The regiments, too, were made up largely of
members of the same clan, and each regiment had its own complete staff
of native officers. Conspiracy was easy in such a body. Secrets were
safe. Interests and passions were common. When the British officers had
all been slaughtered out, the regiment, as a fighting machine, was yet
perfect. Each regiment was practically a unit, knit together by ties of
common blood, and speech, and faith, ruled by common superstitions, and
swayed by common passions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account