Great Britain. Army. Royal Tank Corps; Tanks (Military science)
[Illustration: GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF MARK V. TANK--FRONT VIEW]
[Illustration: GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF MARK V. TANK--SECTIONAL ELEVATION]
When the flaps were closed (see diagram showing interior of a Mark
V. Tank), as they had to be directly the Tank came under close fire,
the crew were in almost complete darkness, and had to rely upon their
periscope or, alternatively, upon minute eye-holes (about the size of
the capital O’s used in this text) bored through the armour-plating. If
the fire was at all heavy the periscope was usually quickly put out of
action, and the officer and gunners had only the extremely limited view
afforded by these holes.
[Illustration: GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF MARK V. TANK--SECTIONAL PLAN]
[Illustration: DIAGRAM SHOWING HOW THE CATERPILLAR METHOD OF TRACTION
CARRIED OUT THE PRINCIPLE OF THE “LARGE-WHEELED TRACTOR.” SEE NOTE AT
END OF CHAPTER II.]
They were thus almost entirely dependent upon their maps, the
special Tank compass, and upon the information which a preliminary
reconnaissance of the ground had given them.
This circumstance not only profoundly modified the training of the
officers and crews, but also necessitated the organisation of what was
almost a new service. This service was the “Reconnaissance” branch of
the Intelligence. When the Tank Corps was ordered to take part in an
attack, the Reconnaissance Staff was responsible for the preliminary
survey of the proposed battle site for a report as to where and how
Tanks could best operate, and finally for a series of detailed maps
and sketches. In these maps and sketches the route of every individual
Tank was set forth from landmark to landmark, together with the
assigned objectives of each machine and the obstacles which it was
likely to encounter. These maps and sketches were compiled from aerial
surveys, captured German maps and documents, information gained from
local inhabitants, accounts given by prisoners, the original Ordnance
survey, and from personal reconnaissance. By 1918 this system had been
so developed that the infantry came to rely almost entirely upon their
accompanying Tanks for direction.
This added greatly to the importance and responsibility of the work
both of Tank Reconnaissance officers and of commanders.
IV
Topographical information can only be adequately conveyed to a more
or less trained receiver, and it was therefore found necessary to add
an elementary course on Reconnaissance to the already long list of
subjects in which the members of every Tank crew must train. The crew
were an assemblage of experts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account