Great Britain. Army. Royal Tank Corps; Tanks (Military science)
The third type was the Whippet. The tracks were nearly as long as those
of a heavy Tank, but the body had been reduced to a small cab perched
at the back, rather as an urchin rides a donkey. It was armed with two
machine-guns, managed by a crew of three men, and developed a speed of
seven miles an hour. Whippets were designed for use as raiders and in
conjunction with cavalry. In practice, however, the cavalry was seldom
able to act with them. Partly in consequence of this, partly owing to
the state of open warfare being of such short duration, the Whippets,
though having brilliant feats to their credit (see the exploits of
“Musical Box,” Chapter XIII), remained creatures of promise rather than
of achievement.
III
As a rule Male Mark V. Tanks were used against Pill-Boxes and other
“strong points,” while the special work of Female Tanks was to
deal with hostile infantry (for example, by sitting astride and
thus enfilading their trenches), and then to finish the process of
flattening the enemy’s wire which the Male Tanks had begun.
All three types of Tank were capable of going across country. That
is to say they could, for example, follow a pack of hounds anywhere,
except perhaps in the Fens.
Ditches, heavy plough, banks, walls, hedges, or fences could all be
negotiated.
Tanks could also go over many obstacles--notably over wire--where the
Field, even were they willing “to take a windmill in the harbour of the
chase,” must go round.
But as a moment’s reflection will show, there must remain in every
country certain features which will prove absolute barriers to the
progress of Tanks.
Chief among these are canals and deep rivers (unless spanned by strong
bridges), very steep railway cuttings, railway embankments, marsh, or
woods in which the trees are too strong to be pushed over, and too
dense-set to be steered through.
Besides these natural, or at least civilian, obstacles, there will be
inevitable military obstacles in any country that has been fought over.
For example, old half-blown-in trench systems make ground “awkward,”
and Tanks operate at extreme disadvantage in country like that round
Ypres, which was by 1917 a continuous network of water-logged shell and
mine craters, with no original ground left at all.
Again, by the close of hostilities the number of anti-Tank devices
employed by the Germans was very considerable. They paid the new arm
the compliment of an intricate system of defence and counter-offence
which included concealed Tank traps made on the model of elephant-pits,
formidable double-traversed trenches, a branch of special anti-Tank
artillery, heavily reinforced concrete stockades, and an elaborate
system of land mines.
With so many obstacles to avoid or to negotiate, with their fate often
hanging upon a prompt and accurate use of their guns, the crew inside
the Tank were doomed by the conditions under which they fought to an
almost incredibly limited view of the surrounding world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account