Great Britain. Army. Royal Tank Corps; Tanks (Military science)
The third set of difficulties came from the M.W.S.D.’s own Tank
designers, and from technical experts of the Fighting Side in France.
Both constantly asked for small alterations in design. Often these
alterations were necessary; frequently they were more or less frivolous
even when they came from what might be considered the best source,
that is, from those who fought the Tanks.
If the M.W.S.D. was sometimes accused of adopting an academic attitude
towards the results of the “acid test” of battle, it may as truly be
said of the Fighting Side that they often underrated the difficulties
and problems of manufacture and failed to appreciate how often quality
could only be obtained by a disproportionate sacrifice of quantity.
III
About the end of December 1916, when the dual control of Tank affairs
had been working for nearly three months, it became obvious that
the system was not one that would easily stand the strain of active
operations. The Tank Corps had outgrown it, and the shoe would soon
begin to pinch. General Elles thus summarised the position in his
report of December 31:
“_In France._ The fighting organisation is under a junior officer
who _faute de mieux_ has become responsible for initiating all
important questions of policy, design, organisation and personnel
through G.H.Q., France, and thence through five different branches
at the War Office.
“_In England._ Administrative and training organisation are under
a senior officer, located 130 miles from the War Office, with a
junior Staff Officer (Staff-Captain) in London to deal with the
five branches above mentioned.
“The system is working now because Headquarters in France have been
free from the questions of operations for most of the last six
weeks, and have, therefore, been in a position to deal imperfectly
and at a distance with the larger aspects of the whole matter.
“This will not be possible when operations become a more pressing
obligation, as they are now doing.
“Then, this duty must devolve either on the five War Office
branches, not one of which, I submit with all respect, can have any
comprehensive grip of the subject, or on the G.O.C., Administrative
Centre, who is out of continued personal touch either with the
War Office or the requirements in this country, and is, moreover,
debarred by his charter from really having any control or direction
except at the instance of his Junior.
“In actual fact, the Director-General of Mechanical Warfare Supply,
an official of the Ministry of Munitions, at the head of a very
energetic body, becomes the head of the whole organisation. This
officer, owing to his lack of military knowledge, requires and
desires guidance, which none of the five departments at the War
Office can, and which the G.O.C., Administrative Centre, is not in
a position to, give him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account