Great Britain. Army. Royal Tank Corps; Tanks (Military science)
The reader is to imagine that just such “growing pains” and just such
difficulties, correspondences and memoranda filled in the background
for the next six months, while the fighting at Arras, at Messines and
in Flanders, whose story we are about to relate, was in progress.
CHAPTER VI
THE BATTLES OF ARRAS AND BULLECOURT
I
The Reconnaissance Officers were the first of the Junior personnel to
learn that operations were contemplated for early April, and that the
new battle was to be fought before the town of Arras on the banks of
the river Scarpe. By the beginning of March, the first small parties
of Battalion and Company Reconnaissance Officers had begun to leave
Bermicourt.
It was rumoured that this offensive was going to be the blooding of the
1st Brigade; it was to be on a much larger scale than any the Tanks had
taken part in on the Somme. It was said that sixty machines would be
thrown in in one action. The Tanks were going to have an opportunity of
making a name for themselves, and of justifying all the embarrassingly
pleasant things that the newspapers had said of them in the previous
September. For this lavish praise had spread a gloom over the Tank
Corps; they had been unmercifully twitted by unfeeling gunners and
infantrymen who knew the real facts.
The newspapers had succeeded in making their intercourse with any
but battalions fresh from England one unbearable round of facile
jest. Never had any unit, save, perhaps, the London Scottish, been so
unmercifully hailed as “Mother’s blue-eyed boy.”
By March they lusted for blood, and the first whispers of battle were
listened to with a satisfied expectancy.
The new 1st Brigade of the Heavy Branch Machine Gun Corps was a very
much more assured body than the little band of pioneers who had waited
so anxiously for the dawn on September 15, 1916.
Owing to delays in manufacture, they were still only equipped with 60
Mark I. Tanks instead of about 120 Mark I.’s and Mark IV.’s, as had
been hoped. Still, the March 1917 Mark I. was very different from the
September 1916 Mark I. The most striking improvement was the shedding
of the cumbersome and ineffectual “Tail” or hydraulic stabiliser.
Most of the machines had also undergone a most careful overhauling at
the hands of the indefatigable vulcan, at the Battalion workshops, and
those innumerable tiny adjustments, repairs and improvements which
constitute “tuning up” had been made.
The machine-gun armament, too, had been modified, the Hotchkiss
being replaced by the Lewis gun. A new contrivance for use on soft
ground had also been fitted, consisting of stout little cigar-shaped
splinter-bars, a yard or so in length, attached to the track by means
of chains.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account