The Tattva-MuktavaliGaudapurnanandacakravarti, active 17th century
Religion
The Tattva-Muktavali
Gaudapurnanandacakravarti, active 17th century
Dvaita (Vedanta) -- Early works to 1800; Hindu philosophy -- Early works to 1800
61. I am sometimes happy, sometimes miserable; He, the supreme Soul,
is always essentially happy. Such is the difference,--then how can
there be identity between these two different substances?
62. He is eternally self-luminous and unobscured,-- intensely pure,
the one witness of the world; not so is the individual soul,--thus
a thunderbolt falls on the tree of the theory of Identity.
63. For those who maintain the identity of the individual and supreme
soul, the hypothesis of a __dvandva compound__ [Footnote: __I.e.__ in
the word __jîvâtmânau__] is precluded; or they bring forward such
words as __d.rishadupala__ as parallel cases [Footnote: I suppose that
this means that the __dvandva__ compound __d.rishadupala__ has some
analogy to one like __jîvâtmânau__, which involves identity, as the
upper and lower millstone form one instrument; but there (in
accordance with Pâ.n. 2. 2. 34, __vârtt.__) the less important word
meaning the upper and smaller stone (__upalâ__) is placed last
(cf. 2. 2. 31)]; the __dvandva__ is only consistent with "difference,"
but in no way with "identity."
64. Where identity is the meaning, there arises the __karmadhâraya__
compound,--for [such a __karmadhâraya__ as] __nîlotpala__ "the
blue-lotus" is used as implying that the two members of the compound
refer to the same subject [Footnote: But __jîvâtmânau__ is a
__dvandva__, not a __karmadhâraya__ compound.]
65. As there are many passages in Šruti such as that which says
"food is Brahman," [Footnote: Brihad Âra.nyaka Upan. v. 12. 1.] so
too this passage "I am Brahman" is to be understood as meaning
worship [Footnote: __I.e.__ this is one of the modes of worshipping
Brahman by meditating on him in some lower visible form, not as
really expressing his real nature.]
66. The doctrine of Identity is not true; wherever it appears to be
declared in Šruti, all those passages are to be taken as only
meaning worship.
67. There are many sentences in the ancient Veda which speak for
non-identity as also for identity; having expelled envy and discussed
the truth, let the wise declare that which each thinks wholesome.
68. O soul, bewildered by a deceived opinion, drive far from thy
mouth these words "I am Brahman"; how canst thou be That, O thou who
art utterly at the mercy of fate, plunged as thou art in the great
ocean of mundane existence hard to be crossed!
69. He who is the beloved of Lakshmi, the ambrosia-ocean, full of
manifest supreme joy; the water of whose feet is Gangâ, worthy to be
worshipped by Rudra and the other gods; who before creation created
all instantaneously by a movement of his brow,--how canst thou say,
O soul, "I am He,"--thou who art a poor beggar, not a king.
70. O slow of mind, how canst thou say, I am He with whom are filled
all the vast stores of this universe in its entirety? Collect thy
faculties calmly in thy heart and consider thine own power; can a
host of fierce world-supporting elephants enter into the belly of a
gnat?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account