The telephone : $b a lecture entitled Researches in electric telephony — John Shaqi
The telephone : $b a lecture entitled Researches in electric telephonyBell, Alexander Graham
Science
The telephone : $b a lecture entitled Researches in electric telephony
Bell, Alexander Graham
Telephone
The method by means of which the musical signals may be sent
simultaneously in both directions along the same circuit is shown in
our next illustration, figures 8, 9, and 10. The arrangement is similar
to that shown in figures 3, 4, and 5, excepting that the intermittent
current from the transmitting instruments is passed through the
primary wires of an induction coil, and the receiving instruments are
placed in circuit with the secondary wire. In this way free earth
communication is secured at either end of the circuit, and the musical
signals produced by the manipulation of any key are received at all the
stations upon the line. The great objection to this plan is the extreme
complication of the parts and the necessity of employing local and main
batteries at every station. It was also found by practical experiment
that it was difficult, if not impossible, upon either of the plans
here shown, to transmit simultaneously the number of musical tones
that theory showed to be feasible. Mature consideration revealed the
fact that this difficulty lay in the nature of the electrical current
employed, and was finally obviated by the invention of the _undulatory_
current.
It is a strange fact that important inventions are often made almost
simultaneously by different persons in different parts of the world,
and the idea of multiple telegraphy as developed in the preceding
diagrams seems to have occurred independently to no less than four
other inventors in America and Europe. Even the details of the
arrangements upon circuit—shown in figures 3, 4, 5, and 8, 9, 10—are
extremely similar in the plans proposed by Mr. Cromwell Varley of
London, Mr. Elisha Gray of Chicago, Mr. Paul La Cour of Copenhagen, and
Mr. Thomas Edison of Newark, New Jersey. Into the question of priority
of invention, of course, it is not my intention to go to-night.
[Illustration: Fig. 8. Fig. 9. Fig. 10.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account