The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
excites our admiration and seems to deserve our applause: and upon this
foundation is grounded the greater part of the praise which is bestowed
upon what are called the intellectual virtues.
The utility of those qualities, it may be thought, is what first
recommends them to us; and, no doubt, the consideration of this, when we
come to attend to it, gives them a new value. Originally, however, we
approve of another man’s judgment, not as something useful, but as
right, as accurate, as agreeable to truth and reality: and it is evident
we attribute those qualities to it for no other reason but because we
find that it agrees with our own. Taste, in the same manner, is
originally approved of, not as useful, but as just, as delicate, and as
precisely suited to its object. The idea of the utility of all qualities
of this kind, is plainly an after-thought, and not what first
recommended them to our approbation.
2. With regard to those objects, which affect in a particular manner
either ourselves or the person whose sentiments we judge of, it is at
once more difficult to preserve this harmony and correspondence, and at
the same time, vastly more important. My companion does not naturally
look upon the misfortune that has befallen me, or the injury that has
been done me, from the same point of view in which I consider them. They
affect me much more nearly. We do not view them from the same station,
as we do a picture, or a poem, or a system of philosophy, and are,
therefore, apt to be very differently affected by them. But I can much
more easily overlook the want of this correspondence of sentiments with
regard to such indifferent objects as concern neither me nor my
companion, than with regard to what interests me so much as the
misfortune that has befallen me, or the injury that has been done me.
Though you despise that picture, or that poem, or even that system of
philosophy, which I admire, there is little danger of our quarrelling
upon that account. Neither of us can reasonably be much interested about
them. They ought all of them to be matters of great indifference to us
both; so that, though our opinions may be opposite, our affections may
still be very nearly the same. But it is quite otherwise with regard to
those objects by which either you or I are particularly affected. Though
your judgment in matters of speculation, though your sentiments in
matters of taste, are quite opposite to mine, I can easily overlook this
opposition; and if I have any degree of temper, I may still find some
entertainment in your conversation, even upon those very subjects. But
if you have either no fellow-feeling for the misfortunes I have met
with, or none that bears any proportion to the grief which distracts me,
or if you have either no indignation at the injuries I have suffered, or
none that bears any proportion to the resentment which transports me, we
can no longer converse upon these subjects. We become intolerable to one
another.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account