The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
Our sympathy, on the contrary, with deep distress, is very strong and
very sincere. It is unnecessary to give an instance. We weep even at the
feigned representation of a tragedy. If you labour, therefore, under any
signal calamity, if by some extraordinary misfortune you are fallen into
poverty, into diseases, into disgrace and disappointment; even though
your own fault may have been, in part, the occasion, yet you may
generally depend upon the sincerest sympathy of all your friends, and,
as far as interest and honour will permit, upon their kindest assistance
too. But if your misfortune is not of this dreadful kind, if you have
only been a little baulked in your ambition, if you have only been
jilted by your mistress, or are only hen-pecked by your wife, lay your
account with the raillery of all your acquaintance.
SECTION III.
Of the effects of prosperity and adversity upon the judgment of mankind
with regard to the propriety of action; and why it is more easy to
obtain their approbation in the one state than in the other.
CHAP. I.
_That though our sympathy with sorrow is generally a more lively
sensation than our sympathy with joy, it commonly falls much more short
of the violence of what is naturally felt by the person principally
concerned._
Our sympathy with sorrow, though not more real, has been more taken
notice of than our sympathy with joy. The word sympathy, in its most
proper and primitive signification, denotes our fellow-feeling with the
sufferings, not that with the enjoyments, of others. A late ingenious
and subtile philosopher thought it necessary to prove, by arguments,
that we had a real sympathy with joy, and that congratulation was a
principle of human nature. Nobody, I believe, ever thought it necessary
to prove that compassion was such.
First of all, our sympathy with sorrow is, in some sense, more universal
than that with joy. Though sorrow is excessive, we may still have some
fellow-feeling with it. What we feel does not, indeed, in this case,
amount to that complete sympathy, to that perfect harmony and
correspondence of sentiments which constitutes approbation. We do not
weep, and exclaim, and lament, with the sufferer. We are sensible, on
the contrary, of his weakness, and of the extravagance of his passion,
and yet often feel a very sensible concern upon his account. But if we
do not entirely enter into, and go along with, the joy of another, we
have no sort of regard or fellow-feeling for it. The man who skips and
dances about with that intemperate and senseless joy which we cannot
accompany him in, is the object of our contempt and indignation.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account