The Theory of Stock Exchange Speculation — John Shaqi
The Theory of Stock Exchange SpeculationCrump, Arthur
General
The Theory of Stock Exchange Speculation
Crump, Arthur
Speculation
It becomes apparent, in examining this account, the extreme danger the
speculator was in just at the period immediately preceding the relapse,
and forcibly demonstrates the importance of acting upon the soundest
of maxims in “time bargain” operations, which is, _never to refuse a
profit_. We have been supposing the speculator to have been “running
the stock,” as the saying is, for nearly a month, during which period
it had been advancing in price. At the same time he had been incurring
expense to have the chance of making a profit by such advance. After
carrying over the transaction, he had incurred the certain loss in any
case of the two commissions and the contango charge, which make together
the sum of £18 14_s._ 6_d._ It seems almost incredible that, under such
circumstances, he should still hold on when he could close with a profit
of £18 15_s._; instead of which he closes with a loss of £12 9_s._ 6_d._,
after having commenced to operate with just as reasonable a prospect of
a fall of ½ per cent., and another on the top of it of ¼. On the other
hand, everything went as well as can ever be expected on a series of
operations, and yet he finishes with a loss. The charges, to begin with,
kill the profit, to say nothing of the “turns” of the dealers, and the
risks of the fluctuations in price.
[Sidenote: BACKWARDATION.]
Backwardation[13] is the term for the charge paid by the speculator
for the fall. The word itself implies that the charge is for holding
back a transaction, as directly opposed to that for which a contango is
paid. The one is to carry forward, and the other to carry backward. A
speculator who sells for the fall, and thereby makes himself a bear, must
pay something if he wishes to keep the transaction open; just as the bull
must, unless exceptional circumstances are influencing the market. When
the settlement arrives, a bear must either deliver what he has sold, or
pay the backwardation demanded for postponing delivery; which, in other
words, is the price paid for obtaining the stock elsewhere. If the supply
of stock should chance to be large, he will find it very easy to continue
his bear account, because the stock he has sold is not wanted. Under such
circumstances, the position of the bear speculator comes to be the exact
antithesis of that in which the bull finds himself at the settlement when
the stock he has bought is scarce. In both cases the charges recede until
either the transactions are carried over “even,”[14] that is to say, for
nothing, or it may be the speculator receives a consideration. As in all
other markets, it is a question of paying or receiving, and the one or
the other depends upon the relation which the demand bears to the supply.
As we shall have occasion farther on to speak more minutely upon bear
speculations, we shall not pursue the subject at any length here; suffice
it to say that the public, as speculators, do not understand selling for
the fall. It goes against the grain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account