The Three Choirs: A Handbook to the Cathedrals of Gloucester, Hereford, and Worcester: A Complete Description of the Buildings, a History of Each Diocese and Biographical Notices of the BishopsKing, R. J. (Richard John)
Religion
The Three Choirs: A Handbook to the Cathedrals of Gloucester, Hereford, and Worcester: A Complete Description of the Buildings, a History of Each Diocese and Biographical Notices of the Bishops
The _Early English_ portion of the cathedral (the whole of the church
east of the central tower) is by far the most interesting, and affords
some very good examples of design and sculpture. On the whole, however,
although the entire building deserves, and will repay, careful
examination, it can hardly be said to rank among English churches of the
first class. The Norman cathedral, which covered nearly the same ground
as that which now exists, terminated eastward (as appears from the
crypt, § XXII.) in a broad apse, with small apsidal chapels attached at
the sides. The ground-plan of the existing building forms a double or
patriarchal cross[62], with a square eastern end. The whole north front
of the cathedral is seen at once as the Close is entered from the
High-street; but although the length (450 ft.) and general mass are
imposing, the view is hardly picturesque [_Frontispiece_]. The transepts
do not project far enough to break the long line satisfactorily, and
the whole work of the exterior (including the central tower) is
unusually plain. This view has, however, been greatly improved by the
recent (1865) lowering of the ground on the north side of the church
(including St. Michael’s churchyard) to the depth of at least four feet.
No good general point of view can be obtained on the south side of the
cathedral.
Since the year 1857 very extensive works, amounting in fact to a
rebuilding of much of the eastern portion of the church, have been
carried on under the superintendence of Mr. A. E. Perkins, architect to
the Dean and Chapter. These will be pointed out as we proceed. It may be
said here, however, that besides the great desecration and injury which
the building suffered from the troops of Essex in 1642, and again from
Cromwell’s soldiers after the battle of Worcester in 1651, it underwent
much unfortunate “restoration” during the eighteenth century. Much of
the work then done it was desirable to remove; and the condition of the
stone in many parts of the cathedral was such as to render extensive
repair absolutely necessary[63]. The stone used by the Norman and Early
English builders was from the Higley quarries, near Bridgenorth; these
quarries are in the sandstone; as are those at Holt, which were used by
the builders of the Perpendicular period. For the repairs and rebuilding
(1857-1863) stone has been brought from Ombersley, near Droitwich.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account