The Three Voyages of William Barents to the Arctic Regions (1594, 1595, and 1596)Veer, Gerrit de
History
The Three Voyages of William Barents to the Arctic Regions (1594, 1595, and 1596)
Veer, Gerrit de
Barentsz, Willem, approximately 1550-1597; Northeast Passage
After passing Cape Nassau, Barents continued his course southwards
without any remarkable incident, till on the 15th of August he reached
the islands of “Matfloe and Dolgoy,”—Matvyeéa Ostrov and Dolgoi Ostrov
of the Russians, meaning Matthew’s Island and Long Island,—where he
fell in with Nai and Tetgales, who had just arrived there, on their
return from the Sea of Kara through Yugorsky Shar (Pet’s Strait), to
which, with pardonable national vanity, they had given the name of the
Strait of Nassau. Their report was that they had sailed fifty or sixty
Dutch miles (200 or 240 geographical miles) to the eastward of that
strait, and in their opinion had reached about the longitude of the
river Ob, and were not far from Cape Tabin (Taimur), the furthest point
of Tartary, whence the coast trended to the south-east, and afterwards
to the south, towards the kingdom of Cathay. [132]
After much rejoicing on both sides at their happy meeting, the whole
fleet now sailed homewards in company, and on the 14th of September
came to the Doggers Sand, whence Nai, in the Swan, proceeded to
Middelburg, whilst the other vessels passed by the Texel to their
several ports.
The reports made by Barents and Linschoten of the results of their
respective voyages were very different in character. The former, though
anything but an illiterate man, could make no pretensions to
scholarship. The latter was an accomplished scholar, as is plainly
shown by his narrative of this first and of the second voyage (which
will be more particularly noticed in the sequel), and by his other
published works; and though the vessels which he accompanied had not in
reality accomplished so much as those of Barents, yet he appears to
have had no difficulty in convincing their employers and the higher
authorities that they had been not far from the realisation of the
object of their voyage.
That, in the estimation of the Amsterdammers, Linschoten represented
matters in too favourable a light, is manifest from Gerrit de Veer’s
innuendo at the commencement of his description of the second voyage,
that he “de saeck vry wat breedt voort stelde,” [133] which caused
Linschoten to reply that, whether he had done so or not, he left to the
judgment of the discreet reader. [134]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account