The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
When the Reformed Faith ousted Popery the jurisdiction of the Bishop
of London over this chapel ceased, and it has ever since remained a
benefice donative over which the Bishop has no power of visitation
or deprivation, since the Tower itself is extra-parochial. Private
marriages could be solemnised at St Peter’s, and in Ben Jonson’s “Every
Man in his Humour,” this privilege is alluded to. One unlucky curate
of the chapel, however, was sent to prison in James the First’s reign
for having performed marriages and christenings in the chapel, and only
secured his liberty through the influence of Sir William Waad, the
Lieutenant of the Tower. Another clergyman named Hubbock and his son
were excommunicated in 1620 by Laud for committing the same offence.
Later on, however, the right of solemnising marriages and christenings
in this chapel was allowed, and still continues.
Samuel Pepys has described in one of his vivid word pictures a visit he
paid to the chapel after the Restoration, when he occupied one of the
hideous pews that then choked the floor, and which were only removed a
few years ago. “February 28, 1663–4. Lord’s Day. The Lieutenant of the
Tower, Sir J. Robinson, would needs have me by coach home with him;
where the officers of his regiment dined with him. I did go and dine
with him, his ordinary table being very good, and his lady a very
high carried, but a comely big woman, I was mightily pleased with her.
After dinner to chapel in the Tower with the Lieutenant, with the keys
carried before us; and I sat with the Lieutenant in his pew in great
state. None it seems of the prisoners in the Tower that are there now,
though they may, will come to prayers there.” With a monstrous gallery
built in the reign of George II. for the use of the troops of the
garrison, with the ugly square wooden pews, in one of which Pepys sat
“in great state”; with the pavement all broken and defaced, with walls
and columns whitewashed, and with the handsome carved Tudor ceiling
coated with lath and plaster, it is no wonder that to any one with a
respect for antiquity or love of beauty, St Peter’s in the Tower must
have presented a sad spectacle before its restoration. And it was not
until 1862 that any steps were taken to remove what was nothing less
than a public disgrace. The improvements were commenced by re-opening
the old doorway at the west end, which had been bricked up, the window
of Edward I.’s time was also restored, the broken fragments having been
collected and replaced in their original position. The lath and plaster
which for a century or more had disfigured the ceiling were removed,
and the finely carved old chestnut beams once more uncovered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account