The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Between the years 1660 and 1667, some necessary repairs were undertaken
in the Tower, some five hundred pounds being expended thereon. In
1680 more extensive repairs were made, owing to reports made by
members of the House of Lords who had been appointed by the King in
Council, to inquire into “repairs and other works to be done, in and
about the said Tower of London, for the safety and convenience of the
garrison therein” (Harleian MSS.). An elaborate report was drawn up,
the estimate for the necessary alterations amounting to £6097, 2s.,
but like most of the important undertakings at that time, little, if
anything, was accomplished. The order for these repairs issued by the
Treasury stated that the above sum would be provided “so soon as the
state of His Majesty’s affairs would permit”: but knowing the state of
Charles’s “affairs,” we may be sure nothing came of it.
During the Great Fire of 1666, the Tower ran the most perilous risk in
all its history of utter destruction, and it was only by the timely
blowing up of the buildings which abutted on the walls of the fortress
and by the side of the moat, that the historical structure was saved.
The conflagration began at midnight on the 1st September in a house
in Pudding Lane, not far from where the monument erected in its
commemoration now stands. Pepys, that most invaluable of chroniclers
and domestic historians, then lived in Seething Lane, Crutched Friars.
“Lord’s Day, 2nd September,” he writes: “I made myself ready presently,
and walked to the Tower, and there got up upon one of the high
places (perhaps Pepys mounted to the top of the White Tower), Sir J.
Robinson’s little son going up with me. And there I did see the houses
at that end of the bridge all on fire, and an infinite great fire in
this and the other side of this and of that bridge.” On the seventh of
this September Pepys bears witness to the King’s energy in bringing
assistance to the sufferers by the conflagration. “In the meantime,” he
writes, “his Majesty got to the Tower by water, to demolish the houses
about the Graffs (?), which being built entirely about it, had they
taken fire, and attacked the White Tower where the magazine of powder
lay, would undoubtedly not only have beaten down and destroyed all the
bridge, but sunk and torn the vessels in the river, and rendered the
demolition beyond expression, for several miles about the country.”
Charles certainly showed the Stuart courage as well as resourcefulness
at a crisis, for there can be little doubt that he was chiefly
instrumental in saving the Tower, by ordering the blowing up of the
dangerous buildings attached to its walls.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account