The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
In descent from Joan was Henry Brooke, Lord Cobham, attainted first of
James the First. He was born 1564, and succeeded to the title 1596–7,
and shortly after installed Knight of the Garter. He married Francis
Howard, daughter of the Earl of Nottingham, and widow of the Earl of
Kildare. He was committed to the Tower December 16th, 1603, tried, and
condemned to death, and actually brought out to be executed, but had
been privately reprieved beforehand by James the First, who played
with Cobham and Gray, and their companions, as a cat would with mice.
After fifteen years’ rigorous confinement in the Tower, his health
failed, and he was allowed out, attended by his gaolers, to visit Bath.
This was in 1617, and was taken so ill on his way back he had to stay
at Odiham, Hants, at the house of his brother-in-law, Sir Edward Moore.
He died, with very little doubt, in the Tower, January 24th, 1619,
but the place of his burial has been undiscovered. He had been well
supplied with books, for the Lieutenant of the Tower seized a thousand
volumes at the time of his death of “all learning and languages.” In a
letter from Sir Thomas Wynne to Sir Dudley Carlton (State Papers, Dom
Jac, 1st vol., 105), 28th of January 1619, occurs this passage: “My
Lord Cobham is dead, and lyeth unburied as yet for want of money; he
died a papist.” This probably was only gossip. While in the Tower he
was allowed eight pounds a week for maintenance, but very little of
this ever reached him, it probably was absorbed by his keepers and the
Lieutenant. During his long imprisonment Lady Kildare never troubled
herself further about him. She lived comfortably, first at Cobham, and
afterwards at Copthall, Essex.
By the will of George, Lord Cobham, 1552, the Cobham estates, by an
elaborate settlement, were strictly entailed, so that Henry, Lord
Cobham, only had a life interest, and the King could not seize them;
and probably it was to that fact he owed his life, for the King could
possess them during his life, but not alienate them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account