The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Unfortunately, the next heir was the son of George Brooke, executed for
treason at Winchester, Lord Cobham’s brother, who, at the time of his
uncle’s death, was an infant of tender age, and without friends, so
negotiations were carried on with the next in succession, Duke Brooke,
a cousin of Lord Cobham’s, and this man parted with his prospective
rights to the King for about £10,000, which enabled this “specimen
of King craft” to enter into possession. Duke Brooke, dying soon after,
Charles Brooke, his brother, parted with several other manors to Cecil,
Earl of Salisbury. None of these transactions were legal; Henry, Lord
Cobham, was not dead, nor the children of George Brooke, William, and
his two sisters, Frances and Elizabeth. For some reason they were
“restored in blood,” but with the express proviso they should not
inherit any of the property of their fathers or their uncles; nor was
William to take the title of Lord Cobham. And this was all done with
the connivance of Cecil, Lord Burleigh, brother-in-law to Henry, Lord
Cobham. No wonder William Brooke became a devoted Parliamentarian in
the next reign, and died fighting against the King at Newbury, 1643.
Many letters of Henry Brooke have been preserved while in the Tower:
“To my very good Lord and Brother-in-law, Lord Burleigh.” He must both
have been clever and learned, for during his captivity he translated
Seneca’s treatises, _De Providentia, De Ira, De Tranquilitate, De
Vita Beata, and De Paupertate_: the original manuscript of one, _De
Providentia_, is in the library at Ufford Place, Suffolk, the seat of
his representative, Edward Brooke, Esq., written in a beautifully fine
hand. Raleigh and Cobham’s “treason” was that known as the Main or
Spanish Treason, one of the supposed objects of which was to place the
Lady Arabella Stuart on the throne.
[Illustration: _The Moat looking West_]
Lord Grey de Wilton, a young man of great promise, died in St Thomas’s
Tower in 1617, after passing nine years in the Brick Tower. Lord Grey
had made an eloquent defence during his trial, which lasted from eight
in the morning until eight at night, during which, according to the
Hardwicke State Papers, many “subtle traverses and escapes,” took
place. When Grey was asked why judgment of death should not be passed
against him, he replied, “I have nothing to say.” Then he paused a
little, and added, “And yet a word of Tacitus comes into my mind, ‘non
eadem omnibus decora,’ the house of the Wiltons have spent many lives
in their Princes’ service and Grey cannot beg his.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account