The training of an infantry companyKirkpatrick, E. (Edward)
History
The training of an infantry company
Kirkpatrick, E. (Edward)
Great Britain. Army -- Infantry -- Drill and tactics; Infantry drill and tactics
would have to do if there were signs of unsteadiness.
(_b_) _As a Section or Platoon Acting Alone._
Act on the same lines as before, but let the commander run the
show, which he should be able to do, after having done it under
supervision. One party (a file or two in the case of a section,
or one or two sections in that of a platoon) gets back to a fire
position and opens fire to cover the retirement of the other. In
general, it is better that both parties should not fall back on one
and the same fire position; on the contrary, if they act on a wide
front in ordinary country—say, three hundred yards apart—their fire
is equally effective, but the enemy is broken up, and the danger of
their being outflanked or surrounded is less. For the same reason it
is good practice, if the platoon is strong, to send out groups of
four or five men still further on the flanks, and a group to precede
the whole on the line of retirement by six hundred yards or so, in
order to occupy positions and deny them to the enemy, and after one
or two turns of this exercise tell the skeleton enemy to follow on
harder and try to work round the flanks. In this part also continue
to order casualties of leaders.
EXERCISE VII.
THE SECTION AND PLATOON IN INDEPENDENT ATTACK.
It is very important to secure the intelligent co-operation of
section and platoon commanders in the operations in which their
company or battalion is taking part. I have read that in the
Russo-Japanese War the result of one of the battles—I think at
Penlin, 31st July—turned on the action of an infantry section who
gained a footing on the extreme flank of the Russian line, and
drove off the defenders in the immediate vicinity, opened a way for
the advance of the greater numbers, and led to the outflanking and
retreat of the whole Russian force. If you give your unit commanders
some chances of carrying out attacks, acting as if unsupported by
other troops, they will find themselves faced with the same problems
which confront commanders of larger bodies in the attack, and they
will be more likely, when acting in combination, to look beyond just
the limits of their own commands; they will be led to comprehend
the object of operations and the difficulties in the way, and
will become quick to seize any opportunity to further the general
plan without waiting for orders. It is true that so small a body
as a section would seldom be formally told to attack an objective
single-handed, but there are often occasions on service when a
platoon might have to carry out an attack on a small scale, as when a
few of the enemy’s riflemen are making themselves unpleasant, while
not in sufficient force to do more than “snipe,” or to require the
diversion against them of a whole company. Though a section as now
constituted is a very small unit to work with, I think no excuse is
needed for performing the attack with the smallest unit, having in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account