Asia -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Mongols -- History; Polo, Marco, 1254-1323?; Voyages and travels
Martini speaks, apparently from personal knowledge, of the
splendour of the city, as regards both its public edifices and
its site, sloping gradually up from the banks of the River Wei,
so as to exhibit its walls and palaces at one view like the
interior of an amphitheatre. West of the city was a sort of
Water Park, enclosed by a wall 30 _li_ in circumference, full of
lakes, tanks, and canals from the Wei, and within this park were
seven fine palaces and a variety of theatres and other places of
public diversion. To the south-east of the city was an artificial
lake with palaces, gardens, park, etc., originally formed by the
Emperor Hiaowu (B.C. 100), and to the south of the city was another
considerable lake called _Fan_. This may be the Fanchan Lake,
beside which Rashid says that Ananda, the son of Mangalai, built
his palace.
The adjoining districts were the seat of a large Musulman
population, which in 1861–1862 [and again in 1895 (See _Wellby,
Tibet_, ch. xxv.)—H. C.] rose in revolt against the Chinese
authority, and for a time was successful in resisting it. The
capital itself held out, though invested for two years; the rebels
having no artillery. The movement originated at Hwachau, some 60
miles east of Si-ngan fu, now totally destroyed. But the chief seat
of the Mahomedans is a place which they call _Salar_, identified
with Hochau in Kansuh, about 70 miles south-west of Lanchau-fu, the
capital of that province. [Mr. Rockhill (_Land of the Lamas_, p.
40) writes: “Colonel Yule, quoting a Russian work, has it that the
word Salar is used to designate Ho-chou, but this is not absolutely
accurate. Prjevalsky (_Mongolia_, II. 149) makes the following
complicated statement: ‘The Karatangutans outnumber the Mongols
in Koko-nor, but their chief habitations are near the sources of
the Yellow River, where they are called Salirs; they profess the
Mohammedan religion, and have rebelled against China.’ I will
only remark here that the Salar have absolutely no connection
with the so-called Kara-tangutans, who are Tibetans. In a note by
Archimandrite Palladius, in the same work (II. 70), he attempts to
show a connection between the Salar and a colony of Mohammedans
who settled in Western Kan-Suh in the last century, but the _Ming
shih_ (History of the Ming Dynasty) already makes mention of the
Salar, remnants of various Turkish tribes (_Hsi-ch’iang_) who had
settled in the districts of Ho-chou, Huang-chou, T’ao-chou, and
Min-chou, and who were a source of endless trouble to the Empire.
(See _Wei Yuen, Sheng-wu-ki_, vii. 35; also _Huang ch’ing shih kung
t’u_, v. 7.) The Russian traveller, Potanin, found the Salar living
in twenty-four villages, near Hsün-hua t’ing, on the south bank
of the Yellow River. (See _Proc. R. G. S._ ix. 234.) The Annals
of the Ming Dynasty (_Ming Shíh_, ch. 330) say that An-ting wei,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account