The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of ConstantineValla, Lorenzo
History
The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of Constantine
Valla, Lorenzo
Church and state -- Holy Roman Empire; Constitutum Constantini; Popes -- Temporal power -- Early works to 1800
“The Emperor Constantine the fourth day after his baptism conferred this
privilege on the pontiff of the Roman church, that in the whole Roman
world priests should regard him as their head, as judges do the king.”
This sentence is part of the History [Life] of Sylvester,[458] and it
leaves no doubt where [nor why] the document gets its title “privilege.”
But, in the manner of those who fabricate lies, he begins with the truth
for the purpose of winning confidence in his later statements, which are
false, as Sinon says in Virgil:
“... Whate’er
My fate ordains, my words shall be sincere:
I neither can nor dare my birth disclaim;
Greece is my country, Sinon is my name.”[459]
This first; then he put in his lies. So our Sinon does here; for when he
had begun with the truth, he adds:
“In this privilege, among other things, is this: ‘We—together
with all our satraps and the whole Senate and the nobles also,
and all the people subject to the government of the Roman
church[460]—considered it advisable that, as the blessed Peter
is seen to have been constituted vicar of God on the earth, so
the pontiffs who are the representatives of that same chief of
the apostles, should obtain from us and our Empire the power of
a supremacy greater than the clemency of our earthly imperial
serenity is seen to have conceded to it.’”
O thou scoundrel, thou villain! The same history [the Life of Sylvester]
which you allege as your evidence, says that for a long time none of
senatorial rank was willing to accept the Christian religion, and that
Constantine solicited the poor with bribes to be baptized. And you say
that within the first days, immediately, the Senate, the nobles, the
satraps, as though already Christians, with the Caesar passed decrees for
the honoring of the Roman church! What! How do you want to have satraps
come in here? Numskull, blockhead! Do the Caesars speak thus; are Roman
decrees usually drafted thus? Whoever heard of satraps being mentioned
in the councils of the Romans?[461] I do not remember ever to have read
of any Roman satrap being mentioned, or even of a satrap in any of the
Roman provinces. But this fellow speaks of the Emperor’s satraps, and
puts them in before the Senate, though all honors, even those bestowed
upon the ruling prince, are decreed by the Senate alone, or with the
addition “and the Roman people.” Thus we see carved on ancient stones
or bronze tablets or coins two letters, “S. C.,” that is “By decree of
the Senate,” or four, “S. P. Q. R.,” that is, “The Senate and the Roman
People.” And according to Tertullian, when Pontius Pilate had written
to Tiberius Caesar and not to the Senate concerning the wonderful deeds
of Christ, inasmuch as magistrates were supposed to write concerning
important matters to the Senate, the Senate gave way to spite and opposed
Tiberius’ proposal that Jesus be worshipped as a God, merely on account
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account