The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of ConstantineValla, Lorenzo
History
The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of Constantine
Valla, Lorenzo
Church and state -- Holy Roman Empire; Constitutum Constantini; Popes -- Temporal power -- Early works to 1800
“Conferring also on him the imperial sceptres.” What a turn of speech!
What splendor! What harmony! What are these imperial sceptres? There is
one sceptre, not several; if indeed the Emperor carried a sceptre at all.
Will now the pontiff carry a sceptre in his hand? Why not give him a
sword also, and helmet and javelin?
“And at the same time all the standards and banners.” What do you
understand by “standards” [signa]? “Signa” are either statues (hence
frequently we read “signa et tabulas” for pieces of sculpture and
paintings;—for the ancients did not paint on walls, but on tablets) or
military standards (hence that phrase “Standards, matched eagles”[475]).
In the former sense small statues and sculptures are called “sigilla.”
Now then, did Constantine give Sylvester his statues or his eagles? What
could be more absurd? But what “banners” [banna[476]] may signify, I do
not discover. May God destroy you, most depraved of mortals who attribute
barbarous language to a cultured age!
“And different imperial ornaments.” When he said “banners,” he thought he
had been explicit long enough, and therefore he lumped the rest under a
general term. And how frequently he drives home the word “imperial,” as
though there were certain ornaments peculiar to the Emperor over against
the consul, the dictator, the Caesar!
“And all the pomp of our imperial eminence, and the glory of our power.”
“He discards bombast and cubit-long words,”[477] “This king of kings,
Darius, the kinsman of the gods,”[478] never speaking save in the
plural! What is this imperial “pomp”; that of the cucumber twisted in
the grass, and growing at the belly? Do you think the Caesar celebrated
a triumph whenever he left his house, as the Pope now does, preceded
by white horses which servants lead saddled and adorned? To pass over
other follies, nothing is emptier, more unbecoming a Roman pontiff
than this. And what is this “glory”? Would a Latin have called pomp
and paraphernalia “glory,” as is customary in the Hebrew language? And
instead of “soldiers” [milites] you say soldiery [militia[479]] which we
have borrowed from the Hebrews, whose books neither Constantine nor his
secretaries had ever laid eyes on!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account