The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of ConstantineValla, Lorenzo
History
The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of Constantine
Valla, Lorenzo
Church and state -- Holy Roman Empire; Constitutum Constantini; Popes -- Temporal power -- Early works to 1800
Wherefore, let whoever is called Emperor of the Romans know that in my
judgment he is not Augustus, nor Caesar, nor Emperor, unless he rules at
Rome; and unless he takes up the recovery of the city of Rome, he will
plainly be forsworn. For those earlier Caesars, and Constantine first
of them, were not forced to take the oath by which the Caesars are now
bound; but rather the oath that, so far as it lay in human power, they
would not diminish the extent of the Roman Empire, but would diligently
add to it.
Yet not for this reason are they called Augusti, namely that they
ought to augment the Empire, as some think whose knowledge of Latin is
imperfect; for he is called Augustus, as consecrated, from “avium gustus”
(the taste, or appetite, of the birds), a customary step in consulting
the omens: and this derivation is supported by the language of the
Greeks, among whom the Augustus is called Σεβαστός, from which Sebastia
gets its name. Better might the supreme pontiff be called Augustus from
“augere” (to augment), except for the fact that when he augments his
temporal he diminishes his spiritual power. Thus it is a fact that the
worse the supreme pontiff is, the more he exerts himself to defend this
Donation. Take the case of Boniface VIII, who deceived Celestine by
means of pipes fixed in the wall.[522] He both writes concerning the
Donation of Constantine, and he despoils the French king; and, as though
he wished to put the Donation of Constantine in execution, he decrees
that the kingdom itself belonged to and was subject to the Roman church.
This decretal his successors, Benedict and Clement, revoked outright, as
wicked and unjust.
But what is the significance of your anxiety, Roman pontiffs, in
requiring each Emperor to confirm the Donation of Constantine, unless it
be that you distrust its legality? But you are washing bricks [you labor
in vain], as they say; for that Donation never existed, and since it does
not exist it cannot be confirmed; and whatever the Caesars grant, their
acts are due to deception as to the precedent of Constantine; and they
cannot grant the Empire.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account