The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of ConstantineValla, Lorenzo
History
The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of Constantine
Valla, Lorenzo
Church and state -- Holy Roman Empire; Constitutum Constantini; Popes -- Temporal power -- Early works to 1800
O avarice, ever blind and ill-advised! Let us suppose that you may be
able to adduce even genuine documents for the assent of Sylvester,
not tampered with, authentic: even so, were the grants actually made
which are found in such documents? Where is any taking possession, any
delivery? For if Constantine gave a charter only, he did not want to
befriend Sylvester, but to mock him. It is likely, you say, that any
one who makes a grant, gives possession of it, also. See what you are
saying; for it is certain that possession was not given, and the question
is whether the title was given! It is likely that one who did not give
possession did not want to give the title either.
Or is it not certain that possession was never given? To deny it is the
sheerest impudence. Did Constantine ever lead Sylvester in state to the
Capitol amid the shouts of the assembled Quirites, heathen as they were?
Did he place him on a golden throne in the presence of the whole Senate?
Did he command the magistrates, each in the order of his rank, to salute
their king and prostrate themselves before him? This, rather than the
giving of some palace such as the Lateran, is customary in the creation
of new rulers. Did he afterwards escort him through all Italy? Did he
go with him to the Gauls? Did he go to the Spains? Did he go to the
Germans, and the rest of the West? Or if they both thought it too onerous
to traverse so many lands, to whom did they delegate such an important
function, to represent Caesar in transferring possession and Sylvester in
receiving it? Distinguished men, and men of eminent authority, they must
have been: and nevertheless we do not know who they were. And how much
weight there is here in these two words, _give_ and _receive_! To pass
by ancient instances, I do not remember to have seen any other procedure
when any one was made lord of a city, a country, or a province; for we do
not count possession as given until the old magistrates are removed and
the new ones substituted. If then Sylvester had not demanded that this be
done, nevertheless the dignity of Constantine required that he show that
he gave possession not in words but in fact, that he ordered his officers
to retire and others to be substituted by Sylvester. Possession is not
transferred when it remains in the hands of those who had it before, and
the new master dares not remove them.
But grant that this also does not stand in the way, that,
notwithstanding, we assume Sylvester to have been in possession, and
let us say that the whole transaction took place though not in the
customary and natural way. After Constantine went away, what governors
did Sylvester place over his provinces and cities, what wars did he wage,
what nations that took up arms did he subdue, through whom did he carry
on this government? We know none of these circumstances, you answer. So!
I think all this was done in the nighttime, and no one saw it at all!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account