The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of ConstantineValla, Lorenzo
History
The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of Constantine
Valla, Lorenzo
Church and state -- Holy Roman Empire; Constitutum Constantini; Popes -- Temporal power -- Early works to 1800
But it is high time, if I am not to be too prolix, to give the
adversaries’ cause, already struck down and mangled, the mortal blow
and to cut its throat with a single stroke. Almost every history worthy
of the name speaks of Constantine as a Christian from boyhood, with his
father Constantius, long before the pontificate of Sylvester; as, for
instance, Eusebius, author of the Church History, which Rufinus, himself
a great scholar, translated into Latin, adding two books on his own
times.[449] Both of these men were nearly contemporary with Constantine.
Add to this also the testimony of the Roman pontiff who not only took
part, but the leading part in these events, who was not merely a witness
but the prime mover, who narrates, not another’s doings, but his own. I
refer to Pope Melchiades, Sylvester’s immediate predecessor. He says:
“The church reached the point where not only the nations, but even the
Roman rulers who held sway over the whole world, came together into the
faith of Christ and the sacraments of the faith. One of their number, a
most devout man, Constantine, the first openly to come to belief in the
Truth, gave permission to those living under his government, throughout
the whole world, not only to become Christians, but even to build
churches, and he decreed that landed estates be distributed among these.
Finally also the said ruler bestowed immense offerings, and began the
building of the temple which was the first seat of the blessed Peter,
going so far as to leave his imperial residence and give it over for the
use of the blessed Peter and his successors.”[450] You see, incidentally,
that Melchiades does not say that anything was given by Constantine
except the Lateran palace, and landed estates, which Gregory mentions
very frequently in his register. Where are those who do not permit us to
call into question whether the Donation of Constantine is valid, when the
“donation” both antedated Sylvester and conferred private possessions
alone?
But though it is all obvious and clear, yet the deed of gift itself,
which those fools always put forward, must be discussed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account