The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
is a typical description.[73] Another indication of the dislike of this
season is found in a curious “Pastoral” by Washbourne in which hell is
represented as a place where it is “alwaies winter.”[74] It will be
observed later that a sense of joy in winter scenes is one of the very
early indications of a reviving interest in the out-door world.
Correspondent with the dislike and neglect of the grand and the
terrible in Nature is a similar feeling toward such aspects of the
external world as especially suggest mystery, remoteness, unseen
forces. That this is true may be seen by a study of the sky phenomena
that appear, or fail to appear, in this classical poetry. The day-time
sky is but briefly and vaguely mentioned or it passes unobserved.
A phrase so imaginative as Blackmore’s “blue gulph of interposing
sky”[75] is rare. In general it is only the more striking aspects of
the sky that are noticed, such aspects as would catch the attention of
a child or of a mere casual observer. Fleeting, delicate effects are
unheeded. Clouds receive little attention except as they portend or
accompany a storm, and even then their chief use is in similitudes.
Apparently the best-known appearance of the day-time sky is the
rainbow. But though it is often mentioned there is singularly little
variety in the phrases used to describe it. A brief summary of those
phrases most frequently used is interesting: “Painted clouds;” “the
clouds’ gaudy bow;” “the gaudy heavenly bow;” “the watery bow;” “the
painted bow;” “painted tears;” “the gaudy drapery of heaven’s fair
bow;” “the showery arch;” the bow “painted by Iris;” the bow “deck’d
like a gaudy bride;” “the painted arch of summer skies,”[76] and so
on through a wearisome list of kaleidoscopic combinations of the same
words. The constant repetition of adjectives so unmeaning as “watery”
and “showery,” or so external and artificial as “gaudy” and “painted”
is as characteristic of the general attitude toward Nature as is the
fact that the attention of poets should have been concentrated on the
obvious beauties of the rainbow rather than on the finer, more subtle
charms of the sky. In the same way sunrise, and especially sunset, are
often mentioned and occasionally described. But there is practically
no discriminating and appreciative study of what was actually to be
seen in the heavens. It was more natural to sit at home and read the
classics, and then announce that the golden god of day “drives down
his flaming chariot to the sea.”[77]
Twilight had, as might be expected, little charm or suggestiveness.
Moonlight also plays a most subordinate part in this poetry.[78]
We seldom find anything more direct or vivid than the time-honored
statement that “fair” or “pale” Cynthia “mounts the vaulted sky,” and
“adorns the night” with her silver beams.[79]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account