The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
Pikes is “as grand an assemblage of mountains, dells, and chasms, as
ever the fancy of Poussin suggested, or the genius of Rosa invented.”
Later in the century the scenic school of the Italians partially gave
way before the growing supremacy of the Dutch artists. In 1795 “Anthony
Pasquin” in a critical review of the pictures exhibited in that year
says,
When many of our present race of landscape painters wish to make
a _study_, they do it by their firesides; they take an old
perished copy of Wynants, Ruysdael, or Hobbima, or a damaged
copy from some eminent artist, and _compose_ by stealing a
tree from one, a dock-leaf from another, and a waterfall from
a third. By this means we have Flemish landscapes peopled with
English figures, and the same unvaried scenes served up _ad
infinitum_.
That the taste of the purchasing public remained, until late in the
century, steadily in favor of foreign work may be shown in various
ways. Hogarth’s satires on the rage for “Old Masters” and Foote’s
comedy “Taste” (1752) in which a picture is pronounced excellent
until discovered to be by “an Englishman _now living_” when it
is discarded as “not worth house-room,” are significant mid-century
attacks on the undiscriminating demand for continental pictures.
Records of sale by the celebrated auctioneer Longford illustrate the
same fact. In 1764 he sold a collection of two hundred and fifty
paintings belonging to Roger Hearne. About one third of these were
landscapes, but not a single English artist, unless Van de Velde should
be so counted, is represented in the list. In 1765 the pictures of
“Mr. Samuel Scott, Painter (who is retiring into the Country)” were
sold. Of these pictures thirty-three were his own landscapes. Of the
remaining ninety canvases nearly all were landscapes, but again with
no English names in the list except Lambert and Marlow. In 1768 Mr.
Thomas Payne’s collection, largely made up of landscapes, has one each
by Monamy, Swaine, Lambert, Scott, and three by Wootton. In 1769 the
pictures of Smith of Derby were sold. He had five by Brooking, but all
the rest were his own unsold canvases of Lake District, Derbyshire,
and Yorkshire views. George Barret’s sale in 1771 was an attempt to
dispose of sixty-seven of his own views in Wales, Ireland, and the Lake
District. He advertised “waterfalls, effects of morning, of evening,
of moonlight, a remarkable great tree, etc., etc.” It is not till
1790 that we come upon a distinctively English collection. In that
year “Mr. Serres, Jun., Marine Painter (Going to Italy)” offered for
sale five hundred and fifteen pictures nearly two hundred of which
were landscapes by English artists. Thirty-two artists were named in
the list. This slow development of English appreciation for English
landscape art makes all the more evident the vitality of the impulse
that led to productivity so ample and varied in that field.
CHAPTER VII
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account