The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
In the foregoing study of the attitude of the classical poets toward
Nature certain dominant characteristics have been indicated, all of
them pointing to a lack of interest in Nature. The attention of the
age was concentrated elsewhere. Not Nature, but man was the supreme
interest. And the limitations must be drawn even more closely, for
the interest was not in man as man according to the democratic spirit
of the succeeding romantic age, nor in man as a creature of daring,
of wild passions, of lawless enthusiasms, of boundless energies, as
in the preceding Elizabethan age, but man as part of a well-organized
social system. Man in London was the central thought of the age.
This supremacy of the interest in man accounts for the acknowledged
preference for city life. In the country bad roads and poor conveyances
effectually separated men from each other. In the city the wits of
the coffee-house and the beaux and belles of the drawing-room were
able to gain the social converse and mutual admiration necessary to
their happiness. What they had to say to each other was incomparably
more interesting than any revelation from Nature’s solitary places.
Men feared and disliked mountains and the sea because these natural
features stood as obstacles to the easy pursuit of many pleasures,
and because in the presence of forces so vast and elemental men felt
themselves overawed and threatened. What they could not understand
and conquer was their foe. They turned uneasily from all forms of
Nature that suggest mysterious, unseen forces over which man has no
control. The limitless spaces of the sky, the “solemn midnight’s
tingling silentness,” the magical charm of moonlight, whatever is
infinite in its suggestiveness, drawing the spirit of man into the
vast, shadowy realms of the unknown, filled them with dismay. In
Nature as in everything else they instinctively confined themselves
to such portions of truth as they could clearly state and use. The
kind of Nature they loved was that in which man was easily supreme.
Their delight in cultivated rural England was largely based on its
power of ministering to man’s ease and physical well-being.[196] Their
delight in the formal garden grew out of their pleasure in seeing the
triumphal expenditure of human effort. There Nature was “rhymed and
twisted and harmonized” at pleasure. Man’s supremacy was nowhere else
more effectually acknowledged. Not art concealed but art manifest was
the ideal. Evelyn’s enjoyment of French and Italian gardens is almost
always based on his pleasure in some mechanical device whereby man had
conquered Nature.[197] What Cowley most enjoyed in the country was the
sense of his own skill and mastery. The “best natured” satisfaction
of all is, he says, the husbandman’s delight in “looking round about
him and seeing nothing but the effects and improvements of his own
art.”[198] The supremacy of the interest in man is further explanatory
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account