The Trial and Conviction of John Church: The Preacher of the Surrey Tabernacle, Borough Road, at the Surrey Assizes, at Croydon, on Saturday, the 16th of August, 1817, for an Assault With Intent to Commit an Unnatural Crime.Anonymous
Religion
The Trial and Conviction of John Church: The Preacher of the Surrey Tabernacle, Borough Road, at the Surrey Assizes, at Croydon, on Saturday, the 16th of August, 1817, for an Assault With Intent to Commit an Unnatural Crime.
Anonymous
Church, J. (John), approximately 1780-approximately 1825 -- Trials, litigation, etc.; Trials (Sodomy) -- England
Were you one of his hearers?—Yes.
Were you acquainted with Mr. Patrick?—Not till the report was made
respecting Mr. Church.
Did you know him as one of the congregation attending Mr. Church?—No, I
cannot say I did.
Were you with Mr. Patrick on any day that he went to Mr. Church’s house—I
mean on the 9th of October?—Yes, a few days after the report.
Did you go into the house with him?—No, I did not.
You were at the door?—I staid outside.
Had you learnt from Mr. Patrick that he was going to Mr. Church’s upon
the subject of this business?—Yes.
By Lord ELLENBOROUGH.—Did he tell you that he had a letter, and was going
to make inquiries of Mr. Church?—He called upon me at my house to go with
him.
By the COMMON SERJEANT.—And told you he was going to Mr. Church’s upon
the business of this inquiry?—Yes; indeed it was my request that he
should. Mr. Thomas went to speak to his wife; and it was at my wife’s
request and Mrs. Patrick’s I believe that he went.
Your wife joined in her request?—Yes.
How long might his interview with Mr. Church last—how long was he in the
house?—He seemed to be a long while; not much less than an hour.
As near as you could guess, the time, was it near an hour?—Yes.
When he came out did you put any questions to him respecting what had
passed between; him and Mr. Church?—Yes.
What questions did you put?—I asked him what Mr. Church had said.
What answer did he give you?—He said that Mr. Church did not say any
thing. He said Mr. Church seemed very much confounded on account of the
cause, he supposed, but he said nothing about it; that it would be
injurious to the cause of God. He did not say the _cause of God_, but I
only supposed he meant the cause of God.
By Lord ELLENBOROUGH.—Did he use the words “cause of God?”—No, he said
Mr. Church seemed very much confounded or confused.
Then the rest is all imagination of your’s?—We both imagined alike. I
don’t know that these were exactly the words, for I cannot call to my
mind what he did say; but it was conjectured the cause of God, and which
we heard afterwards was abused abroad.
You are now called, Sir, for the purpose of contradiction. You are
recollecting the effect, you know, of a conversation and communication
with Mr. Patrick, and you must say truly what passed, if you can
recollect it.—I don’t recollect all that passed.
By the COMMON SERJEANT.—When you were stopt in your account of what
passed, you were going to say something. You were asked whether Mr.
Church had said any thing to Mr. Patrick which Mr. Patrick related to
you. What did he say?—He said, No. He said Mr. Church seemed very much
confused.
What did you ask Mr. Patrick next?—“Why,” said I, “what do you mean.
Why, if you know any thing against the man, did you not charge him with
it? I would have been very faithful with him, and charged him with it.”
What answer did Mr. Patrick make to that?—He said he did not know; he was
not the person.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account