The trial of Emile Zola: containing M. Zola's letter to President Faure relating to the Dreyfus case, and a full report of the fifteen days' proceedings in the Assize Court of the Seine, including testimony of witnesses and speeches of counselZola, Émile
History
The trial of Emile Zola: containing M. Zola's letter to President Faure relating to the Dreyfus case, and a full report of the fifteen days' proceedings in the Assize Court of the Seine, including testimony of witnesses and speeches of counsel
Zola, Émile
Dreyfus, Alfred, 1859-1935; Trials (Seditious libel) -- France -- History -- 19th century; Zola, Émile, 1840-1902 -- Trials, litigation, etc.
are the experiences to which he submitted the unfortunate Dreyfus, the
traps into which he tried to lead him, the mad inquiries, the monstrous
fancies, a complete and torturing madness.
Ah! this first affair is a nightmare to one who knows it in its real
details. Major du Paty de Clam arrests Dreyfus, puts him in close
confinement; he runs to Madame Dreyfus, terrorizes her, tells her
that, if she speaks, her husband is lost. Meantime the unfortunate was
tearing his flesh, screaming his innocence. And thus the examination
went on, as in a fifteenth-century chronicle, amid mystery, with a
complication of savage expedients, all based on a single childish
charge, this imbecile _bordereau_, which was not simply a vulgar
treason, but also the most shameless of swindles, for the famous
secrets delivered proved, almost all of them, valueless. If I insist,
it is because here lies the egg from which later was to be hatched the
real crime, the frightful denial of justice, of which France lies ill.
I should like to show in detail how the judicial error was possible;
how it was born of the machinations of Major du Paty de Clam; how
General Mercier and Generals de Boisdeffre and Gonse were led into
it, gradually assuming responsibility for this error, which afterward
they believed it their duty to impose as sacred truth, truth beyond
discussion. At the start there was, on their part, only carelessness
and lack of understanding. At worst we see them yielding to the
religious passions of their surroundings, and to the prejudices of the
_esprit de corps_. They have suffered folly to do its work.
But here is Dreyfus before the council of war. The most absolute
secrecy is demanded. Had a traitor opened the frontier to the enemy
in order to lead the German emperor to Notre Dame, they would not
have taken stricter measures of silence and mystery. The nation
is awe-struck; there are whisperings of terrible doings, of those
monstrous treasons that excite the indignation of History, and
naturally the nation bows. There is no punishment severe enough; it
will applaud even public degradation; it will wish the guilty man
to remain upon his rock of infamy, eaten by remorse. Are they real
then,--these unspeakable things, these dangerous things, capable of
setting Europe aflame, which they have had to bury carefully behind
closed doors? No, there was nothing behind them save the romantic and
mad fancies of Major du Paty de Clam. All this was done only to conceal
the most ridiculous of newspaper novels. And, to assure one’s self of
it, one need only study attentively the indictment read before the
council of war.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account