The trial of Emile Zola: containing M. Zola's letter to President Faure relating to the Dreyfus case, and a full report of the fifteen days' proceedings in the Assize Court of the Seine, including testimony of witnesses and speeches of counsel — John Shaqi
The trial of Emile Zola: containing M. Zola's letter to President Faure relating to the Dreyfus case, and a full report of the fifteen days' proceedings in the Assize Court of the Seine, including testimony of witnesses and speeches of counselZola, Émile
History
The trial of Emile Zola: containing M. Zola's letter to President Faure relating to the Dreyfus case, and a full report of the fifteen days' proceedings in the Assize Court of the Seine, including testimony of witnesses and speeches of counsel
Zola, Émile
Dreyfus, Alfred, 1859-1935; Trials (Seditious libel) -- France -- History -- 19th century; Zola, Émile, 1840-1902 -- Trials, litigation, etc.
Ah! the emptiness of this indictment! That a man could have been
condemned on this document is a prodigy of iniquity. I defy honest
people to read it without feeling their hearts leap with indignation
and crying out their revolt at the thought of the unlimited atonement
yonder, on Devil’s Island. Dreyfus knows several languages--a crime; no
compromising document was found on his premises--a crime; he sometimes
visits the neighborhood of his birth--a crime; he is industrious, he is
desirous of knowing everything--a crime; he does not get confused--a
crime; he gets confused--a crime. And the simplicities of this
document, the formal assertions in the void! We were told of fourteen
counts, but we find, after all, only one,--that of the _bordereau_. And
even as to this we learn that the experts were not in agreement; that
one of them, M. Gobert, was hustled out in military fashion, because
he permitted himself to arrive at another than the desired opinion. We
were told also of twenty-three officers who came to overwhelm Dreyfus
with their testimony. We are still in ignorance of their examination,
but it is certain that all of them did not attack him, and it is to be
remarked, furthermore, that all of them belonged to the war officers.
It is a family trial; there they are all at home; and it must be
remembered that the staff wanted the trial, sat in judgment at it, and
has just passed judgment a second time.
So there remained only the _bordereau_, concerning which the experts
were not in agreement. It is said that in the council-chamber the
judges naturally were going to acquit. And, after that, how easy to
understand the desperate obstinacy with which, in order to justify the
conviction, they affirm today the existence of a secret overwhelming
document, a document that cannot be shown, that legitimates everything,
before which we must bow, an invisible and unknowable god. I deny this
document; I deny it with all my might. A ridiculous document, yes,
perhaps a document concerning little women, in which there is mention
of a certain D---- who becomes too exacting; some husband doubtless,
who thinks that they pay him too low a price for his wife. But a
document of interest to the national defence the production of which
would lead to a declaration of war tomorrow! No, no; it is a lie; and a
lie the more odious and cynical because they lie with impunity, in such
a way that no one can convict them of it. They stir up France; they
hide themselves behind her legitimate emotion; they close mouths by
disturbing hearts, by perverting minds. I know no greater civic crime.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account