The trial of Sacco and Vanzetti : $b A summary of the outstanding testimonyBernheimer, Louis
History
The trial of Sacco and Vanzetti : $b A summary of the outstanding testimony
Bernheimer, Louis
Sacco-Vanzetti Trial, Dedham, Mass., 1921
Stewart at once sought to apply his theory of the commission of the
two “jobs” by one gang. The theory, however, broke down. Orciani
had been at work on the days of both crimes so he was let go.
Sacco, in continuous employment at a shoe factory in Stoughton,
had taken one day off, on April 15th. Hence, while he could not
be charged with the Bridgewater crime, he was charged with the
Braintree murders. Vanzetti, a fish peddler at Plymouth, and his
own employer, could not give the same kind of alibi for either day,
and so he was held for both crimes.
The testimony concerning “consciousness of guilt:”
(1) Sacco and Vanzetti, as we have seen, were two of the four
Italians who called for Boda’s car at Johnson’s garage, on the
evening of May 5th. Following a prearranged plan, Mrs. Johnson went
to a neighbor’s (Bartlett’s) house to telephone the police. She
testified that the two defendants followed her back to the garage.
Thereafter, the men, having been advised by Mr. Johnson not to run
the car without the current year’s number plate, left without it.
Q. “Now, Boda came there to get his car, didn’t he?” A. “Yes, sir.”
Q. “There were no 1920 number plates on it.” A. “No.” Q. “You advised
him not to take the car and run it without 1920 plates, didn’t you?”
A. “Yes.” Q. “And he accepted your view?” A. “He seemed to.” Q. “He
seemed to. And after some conversation, went away?” A. “Yes.”
This was the whole of the testimony on the strength of which Judge
Thayer put the following question to the jury:
“Did the defendants, in company with Orciani and Boda, leave the
Johnson house because the automobile had no 1920 number plate on it,
or because they were conscious of or becoming suspicious of what Mrs.
Johnson did in the Bartlett house? If they left because they had no
1920 number plates on the automobile, then you may say there was no
consciousness of guilt in consequence of the sudden departure; but if
they left because they were consciously guilty[2] of what was being
done by Mrs. Johnson in the Bartlett house, then you may say that it
is evidence tending to prove consciousness of guilt on their part.”
(2) Following their departure from the Johnson House, Sacco and
Vanzetti were arrested by policemen who boarded their street-car as
it was coming into Brockton.
Three policemen testified as to their behavior after being taken into
custody. The testimony of the police that Sacco and Vanzetti were
about to draw pistols was emphatically denied by them.
(3) In statements made to the District Attorney and the chief
of police, at the police station after their arrest, both Sacco
and Vanzetti lied. By mis-statements they tried to conceal their
movements on the day of their arrest, the friends they had been to
see, the places they had visited. For instance, Vanzetti denied that
he knew Boda.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account